From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com>
To: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
jim.houston@ccur.com, joe.korty@ccur.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, dwalker@mvista.com,
David Bahi <DBahi@novell.com>, Moiz Kohari <MKohari@novell.com>,
Sven Dietrich <SDietrich@novell.com>,
dsaxena@plexity.net, williams@redhat.com, abogani@texware.it,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Forward port of latest RT patch (2.6.21.5-rt20) to 2.6.22 available
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:52:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707132052.27563.gene.heskett@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46981855.8040904@bigpond.net.au>
On Friday 13 July 2007, Peter Williams wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Friday 13 July 2007, Peter Williams wrote:
>>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>> * Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 14:07 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>>>> * Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Ingo, Thomas, and the greater linux-rt community,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just wanted to let you guys know that our team has a port of
>>>>>>> the 21.5-rt20 patch for the 2.6.22 kernel available. [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> great! We had the upstream -rt port to .22 in the works too, it was
>>>>>> just held up by the hpet breakage - which Thomas managed to fix
>>>>>> earlier today. I've released the 2.6.22.1-rt1 patch to the usual
>>>>>> place:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
>>>>>
>>>>> Thats awesome, Ingo! Thanks! Could you publish a broken out version
>>>>> as well? We found it extremely valuable to be able to bisect this
>>>>> beast while working on the 21-22 port.
>>>>
>>>> we are working on something in this area :) Stay tuned ...
>>>
>>> I've just been reviewing these patches and have spotted an error in the
>>> file mm/slob.c at lines 500-501 whereby a non existent variable "c" is
>>> referenced. The attached patch is a proposed fix to the problem.
>>
>> Could this explain why 2.6.22.1-rt1 seems to use a lot of swap? I've been
>> as high as 570 megs into swap, currently at 286megs after doing a
>> swapoff --a;swapon -a about 8 hours ago.
>
>No. This problem would have caused the build to fail if slob was
>configured.
>
>Peter
Which, now that I've gone back and looked only has SLAB as the choice in the
make xconfig. It did that switch rather silently as I had been using SLUB
all the way through the 2.6.22-rcN series just to exersize the new option.
In any event, both rt2 and rt3 seem to have that under total control now. No
swap is being indicated by htop, and kmail is up to 122 megs. Uptime with
rt3 is 8.5 hours now & so far everything is running rather nicely. Except of
course for tvtime. I fwd'd the logs from that to the v4l list, but haven't
been graced with a reply as yet.
Thanks Peter.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
There are three ways to get something done:
(1) Do it yourself.
(2) Hire someone to do it for you.
(3) Forbid your kids to do it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-14 0:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-12 12:26 Forward port of latest RT patch (2.6.21.5-rt20) to 2.6.22 available Gregory Haskins
2007-07-12 13:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-13 6:25 ` Peter Williams
2007-07-13 6:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-07-13 8:43 ` Gene Heskett
2007-07-13 9:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-07-14 0:27 ` Peter Williams
2007-07-14 0:52 ` Gene Heskett [this message]
2007-07-26 1:24 ` Minor errors in 2.6.23-rc1-rt2 series Peter Williams
2007-07-26 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-06 1:29 ` Possible error in 2.6.23-rc2-rt1 series Peter Williams
2007-08-06 5:42 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-12 16:26 Forward port of latest RT patch (2.6.21.5-rt20) to 2.6.22 available Gregory Haskins
2007-07-12 16:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-12 20:21 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2007-07-13 12:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-12 11:10 Gregory Haskins
2007-07-12 10:17 Gregory Haskins
2007-07-12 0:58 Gregory Haskins
2007-07-12 1:05 ` Daniel Walker
2007-07-12 5:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-07-12 7:27 ` Alessio Igor Bogani
2007-07-12 12:07 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200707132052.27563.gene.heskett@gmail.com \
--to=gene.heskett@gmail.com \
--cc=DBahi@novell.com \
--cc=MKohari@novell.com \
--cc=SDietrich@novell.com \
--cc=abogani@texware.it \
--cc=dsaxena@plexity.net \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=jim.houston@ccur.com \
--cc=joe.korty@ccur.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox