From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965018AbXGNBjW (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:39:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S937636AbXGNBh1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:37:27 -0400 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:60687 "EHLO mailhub.stusta.mhn.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S937607AbXGNBhY (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:37:24 -0400 Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 03:36:58 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Roland McGrath , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] Use --build-id ld option Message-ID: <20070714013658.GD3565@stusta.de> References: <4695B28E.2020603@goop.org> <20070712062458.6B2BD4D0489@magilla.localdomain> <20070714012301.GB3565@stusta.de> <4698264B.7080406@goop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4698264B.7080406@goop.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 06:26:35PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: >> But note that twice compiling a kernel with the same .config will result >> in a different one. > > Is that true even if you reset the .version counter each time? I'm > thinking of product build systems, in which they value being able to > reproduce the same build (ideally, bit for bit). $ grep UTS_VERSION include/linux/compile.h #define UTS_VERSION "#3 Sat Jul 14 03:21:18 CEST 2007" $ > J cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed