Re: 2.6.22-rc6-mm1

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 01:22:10 -0600 Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > +x86_64-dynticks-disable-hpet_id_legsup-hpets.patch
> > 
> >  pretend to fix it
> 
> I'm not sure what this patch does on x86_64, but it seems like it 
> trashes all HPET support on i386?
> 

It might do, if your i386 is old and has the HPET_ID_LEGSUP bit set.

The code path which that patch disables:

--- a/arch/i386/kernel/hpet.c~x86_64-dynticks-disable-hpet_id_legsup-hpets
+++ a/arch/i386/kernel/hpet.c
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ int __init hpet_enable(void)
 
 	clocksource_register(&clocksource_hpet);
 
-	if (id & HPET_ID_LEGSUP) {
+	if (0 && (id & HPET_ID_LEGSUP)) {
 		hpet_enable_int();
 		hpet_reserve_platform_timers(id);
 		/*
_

will, if executed (on x86_64, at least), instaoops the machine.  It might
take down i386 as well, dunno.

I'd forgotten about this problem, and it seems that Thomas & John have too.
It's a showstopper.