public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: *at syscalls for xattrs?
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:53:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070715205313.GE21668@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707132228460.25352@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>

On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 09:46:27PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> recently, the family of *at() syscalls and functions (openat, fstatat, 
> etc.) have been added to Linux and Glibc, respectively.
> In short: I am missing xattr at functions :)

No.  They are not fscking forks.  They are almost as revolting, but
not quite on the same level.

> BTW, why is fstatat called fstatat and not statat? (Same goes for 
> futimesat.) It does not take a file descriptor for the file argument. 
> Otherwise we'd also need fopenat/funlinkat, etc. Any reasons?

Ulrich having an odd taste?

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-15 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-15 19:46 *at syscalls for xattrs? Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-15 20:53 ` Al Viro [this message]
2007-07-15 21:13   ` Nicholas Miell
2007-07-15 22:23     ` Al Viro
2007-07-15 23:09       ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-16  7:56       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-16  8:04         ` Al Viro
2007-07-16  8:30         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-16  9:05           ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-07-16  9:33             ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-16  9:47               ` Jeff Garzik
2007-07-16 17:57                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-16 20:03                   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-07-16 20:40                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-16  9:12           ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070715205313.GE21668@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox