From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Ni@m" <niam.niam@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: performance -cfs19 vs. -ck1 for 2.6.22
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:55:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070716085545.GA5964@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a9e22dff0707160138v109e2080u96726906ccb8b716@mail.gmail.com>
* Ni@m <niam.niam@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Ingo!
>
> >>Could you run the
> >>following script:
> >> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/cfs-debug-info.sh
> I'll do that! But a little bit later - I have tested that on my home
> computer.
>
> >>hm, is there no other workload on the system?
> Workload: firefox, transmission(torrent client), gnome terminal, music
> player.
>
> Now I think it could be not a scheduler issue but network subsystem
> ... but I've got such situation on previous kernels and w/o torrent
> client running.
>
> The problem is not in switching tabs in firefox but in
> _opening_new_url_. I'm not good in Con's patches but are they touching
> network subsystem?
Con's patches are not really touching the network subsystem, but we want
to analyze this and figure out where the difference in behavior comes
from, be that scheduling, networking or something else.
to help us figure out the nature of the delay, could you do another
thing as well:
strace -ttt -TTT -f -o firefox.trace.txt -p `pidof firefox-bin`
this will produce firefox.trace.txt - compress that via bzip -9. (and
send that file privately - it might include private information embedded
in URLs, etc.) Please do such a trace both under CFS and under -ck,
under similar circumstances.
To isolate it down to the CPU scheduler changes you can create a pure
2.6.22+SD kernel by applying this patch to a vanilla v2.6.22 tree:
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.22/2.6.22-ck1/patches/sched-staircase-deadline-cpu-scheduler.patch
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-16 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-16 8:12 performance -cfs19 vs. -ck1 for 2.6.22 Ni@m
2007-07-16 8:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 8:38 ` Ni@m
2007-07-16 8:55 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
[not found] ` <a9e22dff0707160200q7e266f1bw92cad569bf84b401@mail.gmail.com>
2007-07-16 9:01 ` Fwd: " Ni@m
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070716085545.GA5964@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niam.niam@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox