From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch 2/2] x86_64: FIFO ticket spinlocks
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:49:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070716094940.GA23080@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070716094503.GC21464@wotan.suse.de>
* Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:26:46AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > > [...] trylock is more significantly slower, but they are relatively
> > > rare.
> >
> > trylock is the main thing that the spinlock debugging code uses, and
> > SPINLOCK_DEBUG is frequently enabled by distro kernels. OTOH, the cost
> > looks like to be +5 instructions, right? Still ...
>
> Which trylocks do you mean? The lockbreak spinlocks use trylock, but
> those are not used with the ticket version.
the trylocks in lib/spinlock-debug.c:
static void __spin_lock_debug(spinlock_t *lock)
{
...
if (__raw_spin_trylock(&lock->raw_lock))
return;
...
void _raw_spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
{
debug_spin_lock_before(lock);
if (unlikely(!__raw_spin_trylock(&lock->raw_lock)))
__spin_lock_debug(lock);
debug_spin_lock_after(lock);
}
am i missing something?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-16 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-16 4:59 [rfc][patch 1/2] spinlock: lockbreak cleanups Nick Piggin
2007-07-16 5:01 ` [rfc][patch 2/2] x86_64: FIFO ticket spinlocks Nick Piggin
2007-07-16 9:16 ` Alan Cox
2007-07-16 9:24 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-16 9:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 9:45 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-16 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-07-16 10:18 ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-17 14:25 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-17 15:08 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070716094940.GA23080@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox