From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Olaf Kirch <olaf.kirch@oracle.com>
Cc: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [patch] revert: [NET]: Fix races in net_rx_action vs netpoll
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:57:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070717165720.GA4386@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707171607.08644.olaf.kirch@oracle.com>
* Olaf Kirch <olaf.kirch@oracle.com> wrote:
> Can you try what happens if you change netif_rx_complete to something
> like this:
>
> if (test_bit(__LINK_STATE_POLL_LIST_FROZEN, &dev->state)) {
> dev->quota = dev->weight;
> return;
> }
>
> This is just a hack to make sure that we don't go to insanely negative
> quotas while sending packets through netpoll.
i've done the patch below, but it did not change the timeouts nor did it
solve the 'no network' problem. netconsole output hung earlier as well.
i can try other things too. (it would be best if you sent me
test/debug-patches, instead of letting me hack in the changes - that's
the surest way of ensuring that i test exactly what you intended.)
Ingo
------------->
Index: linux/include/linux/netdevice.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ linux/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -1007,6 +1007,10 @@ static inline int netif_rx_reschedule(st
*/
static inline void __netif_rx_complete(struct net_device *dev)
{
+ if (test_bit(__LINK_STATE_POLL_LIST_FROZEN, &dev->state)) {
+ dev->quota = dev->weight;
+ return;
+ }
BUG_ON(!test_bit(__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, &dev->state));
list_del(&dev->poll_list);
smp_mb__before_clear_bit();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-17 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-16 9:12 [patch] revert: [NET]: Fix races in net_rx_action vs netpoll Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 10:35 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-16 11:26 ` David Miller
2007-07-16 12:18 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-16 13:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 21:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 22:06 ` David Miller
2007-07-16 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-16 21:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 22:09 ` David Miller
2007-07-16 22:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 22:57 ` David Miller
2007-07-17 18:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 22:08 ` David Miller
2007-07-16 22:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-16 22:52 ` David Miller
2007-07-16 23:17 ` Matt Mackall
2007-07-16 23:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-17 7:37 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 8:16 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 5:46 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-17 6:14 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-17 7:55 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 8:28 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 9:29 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-17 14:07 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 16:57 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-07-17 18:06 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 18:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 18:34 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 18:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 12:04 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-18 12:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 12:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 14:41 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-18 16:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 9:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 9:44 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 10:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 10:37 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 10:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 10:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 12:52 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 12:54 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 15:42 ` Kok, Auke
2007-07-19 16:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 19:13 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 19:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 19:35 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 19:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 20:02 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-20 9:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 15:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 15:27 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 15:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 15:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 16:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 17:36 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 17:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 17:51 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 10:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 11:48 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-19 5:58 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-17 17:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-17 9:12 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070717165720.GA4386@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olaf.kirch@oracle.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox