From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755905AbXGRFnF (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 01:43:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752056AbXGRFmx (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 01:42:53 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:43165 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751311AbXGRFmw (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 01:42:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:22:18 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: Balbir Singh Cc: "Paul (??) Menage" , dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux kernel mailing list , Pavel Emelianov , Paul Jackson , Linux Containers , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Containers: css_put() dilemma Message-ID: <20070718055218.GF2216@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20070717070031.GA22410@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <6599ad830707170018p180cb7dfr53e609fd0b186e30@mail.gmail.com> <469C99D1.7090807@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <6599ad830707170849v11fe8cecs6d172cd38d247e09@mail.gmail.com> <469CFF2B.1080702@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <6599ad830707171044u38c0a940r12d2bc80b475ead4@mail.gmail.com> <469D066B.6050606@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <6599ad830707171126o7c431277p84f532d0122a8a98@mail.gmail.com> <469D9728.2080701@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <469DA57F.9050302@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <469DA57F.9050302@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:00:39AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > Thinking out loud again, can we add can_destory() callbacks? I remember suggesting such a callback long before : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117576241131788&w=2 -- Regards, vatsa