public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olaf Kirch <olaf.kirch@ORACLE.COM>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [patch] revert: [NET]: Fix races in net_rx_action vs netpoll
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:41:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707181641.45338.olaf.kirch@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070718124856.GB31215@elte.hu>

On Wednesday 18 July 2007 14:48, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> something i noticed: netconsole output seems to trickle through though, 
> but very, very slowly (a packet once every 4 seconds or so). TCP/IP is 
> not functional.
> 
> also, i'm using netconsole via the command line (both the network driver 
> and netconsole is built into the bzImage), maybe that makes a 
> difference?

Possibly - but so far there's nothing in the code that jumped at me.

Can you try the following please? I'm still pretty much in the dark;
so I'm adding a bunch of printks. Let's hope this doesn't change the
timing in a way that makes the bug disappear.

Thanks
Olaf
-- 
Olaf Kirch  |  --- o --- Nous sommes du soleil we love when we play
okir@lst.de |    / | \   sol.dhoop.naytheet.ah kin.ir.samse.qurax
-----

---
 include/linux/netdevice.h |    4 ++++
 net/core/dev.c            |   14 ++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)

Index: build-2.6/include/linux/netdevice.h
===================================================================
--- build-2.6.orig/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ build-2.6/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -692,6 +692,7 @@ struct softnet_data
 #ifdef CONFIG_NET_DMA
 	struct dma_chan		*net_dma;
 #endif
+	unsigned long		scheduled;
 };
 
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct softnet_data,softnet_data);
@@ -1026,6 +1027,9 @@ static inline void netif_rx_complete(str
 	/* Prevent race with netpoll - yes, this is a kludge.
 	 * But at least it doesn't penalize the non-netpoll
 	 * code path. */
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "netif_rx_complete(%s)%s\n", dev->name,
+			test_bit(__LINK_STATE_POLL_LIST_FROZEN, &dev->state)?
+			" - frozen" : "");
 	if (test_bit(__LINK_STATE_POLL_LIST_FROZEN, &dev->state))
 		return;
 #endif
Index: build-2.6/net/core/dev.c
===================================================================
--- build-2.6.orig/net/core/dev.c
+++ build-2.6/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1192,6 +1192,7 @@ void __netif_rx_schedule(struct net_devi
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "__netif_rx_schedule(%s)\n", dev->name);
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	dev_hold(dev);
 	list_add_tail(&dev->poll_list, &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data).poll_list);
@@ -1199,6 +1200,7 @@ void __netif_rx_schedule(struct net_devi
 		dev->quota += dev->weight;
 	else
 		dev->quota = dev->weight;
+	__get_cpu_var(softnet_data).scheduled = jiffies;
 	__raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
@@ -2028,6 +2030,9 @@ static void net_rx_action(struct softirq
 
 	local_irq_disable();
 
+	/* Complain if we're scheduled way too late. */
+	WARN_ON(time_after(jiffies, __get_cpu_var(softnet_data).scheduled + HZ));
+
 	while (!list_empty(&queue->poll_list)) {
 		struct net_device *dev;
 
@@ -2038,9 +2043,13 @@ static void net_rx_action(struct softirq
 
 		dev = list_entry(queue->poll_list.next,
 				 struct net_device, poll_list);
+
 		have = netpoll_poll_lock(dev);
 
+		BUG_ON(test_bit(__LINK_STATE_POLL_LIST_FROZEN, &dev->state));
 		if (dev->quota <= 0 || dev->poll(dev, &budget)) {
+			printk(KERN_DEBUG "netif_rx_action(%s) - keep on polling\n",
+					dev->name);
 			netpoll_poll_unlock(have);
 			local_irq_disable();
 			list_move_tail(&dev->poll_list, &queue->poll_list);
@@ -2049,6 +2058,10 @@ static void net_rx_action(struct softirq
 			else
 				dev->quota = dev->weight;
 		} else {
+			printk(KERN_DEBUG "netif_rx_action(%s) - done%s\n",
+					dev->name,
+					test_bit(__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, &dev->state)?
+					 "; rx_sched set" : "");
 			netpoll_poll_unlock(have);
 			dev_put(dev);
 			local_irq_disable();
@@ -2074,6 +2087,7 @@ out:
 
 softnet_break:
 	__get_cpu_var(netdev_rx_stat).time_squeeze++;
+	__get_cpu_var(softnet_data).scheduled = jiffies;
 	__raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
 	goto out;
 }


  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-18 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-16  9:12 [patch] revert: [NET]: Fix races in net_rx_action vs netpoll Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 10:35 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-16 11:26 ` David Miller
2007-07-16 12:18   ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-16 13:29     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 21:09   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 22:06     ` David Miller
2007-07-16 21:40   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-16 21:51     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 22:09       ` David Miller
2007-07-16 22:37         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 22:57           ` David Miller
2007-07-17 18:09             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 22:08     ` David Miller
2007-07-16 22:29       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-16 22:52         ` David Miller
2007-07-16 23:17         ` Matt Mackall
2007-07-16 23:34           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-17  7:37       ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17  8:16     ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17  5:46 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-17  6:14   ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-17  7:55     ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17  8:28       ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17  8:57         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17  9:29           ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-17 14:07           ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 16:57             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 18:06               ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 18:18                 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 18:34                   ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 18:56                     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 12:04                       ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-18 12:41                         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 12:48                         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 14:41                           ` Olaf Kirch [this message]
2007-07-18 16:43                             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19  9:09                               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19  9:44                                 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 10:01                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 10:37                                     ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 10:47                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 10:58                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 12:52                                           ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 12:54                                             ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 15:42                                             ` Kok, Auke
2007-07-19 16:07                                               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 19:13                                                 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 19:22                                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 19:35                                                     ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 19:56                                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 20:02                                                         ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-20  9:45                                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 15:07                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 15:27                                             ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 15:32                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 15:52                                               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 16:05                                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 16:13                                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 17:36                                                   ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 17:41                                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 17:51                                                     ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 10:17                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 11:48                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-19  5:58                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-17 17:49           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-17  9:12         ` Jarek Poplawski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200707181641.45338.olaf.kirch@oracle.com \
    --to=olaf.kirch@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox