From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Stable Team <stable@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86_64: hpet tsc calibration fix broken smi detection logic
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:59:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070718195932.ea72e6f0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1184402499.12353.340.camel@chaos>
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:41:39 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> The current SMI detection logic in read_hpet_tsc() makes sure,
> that when a SMI happens between the read of the HPET counter and
> the read of the TSC, this wrong value is used for TSC calibration.
>
> This is not the intention of the function. The comparison must ensure,
> that we do _NOT_ use such a value.
>
> Fix the check to use calibration values where delta of the two TSC reads
> is smaller than a reasonable threshold.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>
> --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/hpet.c
> +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/hpet.c
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ int hpet_reenable(void)
> */
>
> #define TICK_COUNT 100000000
> -#define TICK_MIN 5000
> +#define SMI_THRESHOLD 50000
> #define MAX_TRIES 5
>
> /*
> @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static void __init read_hpet_tsc(int *hpet, int *tsc)
> tsc1 = get_cycles_sync();
> hpet1 = hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER);
> tsc2 = get_cycles_sync();
> - if (tsc2 - tsc1 > TICK_MIN)
> + if ((tsc2 - tsc1) < SMI_TRESHOLD)
> break;
> }
> *hpet = hpet1;
>
So I queued this, and then another patch to revert it so that the
x86_64-clockevents conversion would apply. But I was unable to locate the
corresponding bug in the post-x86_64-clockevents tree. Did it get fixed by
other means in there?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-19 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-14 8:41 [PATCH] X86_64: hpet tsc calibration fix broken smi detection logic Thomas Gleixner
2007-07-19 2:59 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-07-19 13:52 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070718195932.ea72e6f0.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox