Re: Linux 2.4.35 tree abandoned/delayed?

[Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>]

On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 04:03:09PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:50:10 +0200
> Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Tony,
> > 
> > [ first, please always keep people in CC on LKML since it's
> > very easy to
> >   miss a thread ]
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:23:57PM -0800, Tony Borras wrote:
> > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:20:06 +0200
> > > Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > could you please report what the problem was, in case it's
> > > > not fixed yet ?
> > > 
> > > Ok, reproduced error at ./net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
> > >   line 436 changed label:
> > >                    errout -> err_inval
> > 
> > I don't know where you downloaded 2.4.35-pre5 from, but I've
> > checked the sources and could not find any reference to
> > "errout" here in any version!
> > 
> > Or what is possible is that your 2.4.34 kernel got corrupted
> > on your disk after applying any patch. Sometimes, some shell
> > scripts providede with some
> 
> Negatory on that, Willy!
> 
> Here is what I have verified:
>   At kernel.org:/pub/linux/v2.4
> 
> file: patch-2.4.34.3.bz2 has the corruption at line 213:
>   goto errout
> 
> That is where that came from, when I patched my 2.4.34 to arrive
> at 2.4.34.5,

So your 2.4.34.5 tree is wrong, you forgot to apply 2.4.34.4 to it,
which only fixes this goto. You should rebuild your 2.4.34.X tree
from scratch.

> before applying the 2.4.35.rc5 patch!

No, once again, you should not apply any 2.4.35-preX to 2.4.34.X.
You should apply it to plain 2.4.34.

If you don't have it anymore, I suggest that you revert the 2.4.34.X
patches with "patch -R".

Also, I think you got a lot of rejects when applying 2.4.35 on top of
2.4.34.X since most changes are the sames.

Regards,
Willy