public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Olaf Kirch <olaf.kirch@oracle.com>
Cc: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [patch] revert: [NET]: Fix races in net_rx_action vs netpoll
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:01:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070719100135.GA2986@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707191144.24434.olaf.kirch@oracle.com>


* Olaf Kirch <olaf.kirch@oracle.com> wrote:

>  -	You say that netconsole output continues to trickle after
> 	the network gets wedged. This could be caused by the
> 	e1000 watchdog, which triggers a NIC interrupt "to ensure
> 	rx ring is cleaned". I assume that this triggers the
> 	regular e1000_intr, which succeeds in putting the NIC on
> 	the poll_list, and net_rx_action call dev->poll once.

no - it appears that 'trickle' only happened with one of your patches 
(to which i replied with that 'trickle' mail). With what i have booted 
now (only your original patch and nothing else, 100 Hz and !dynticks), 
netconsole output stopped here:

 Calling initcall 0xc0603f55: netpoll_init+0x0/0x39()
 initcall 0xc0603f55: netpoll_init+0x0/0x39() returned 0.
 initcall 0xc0603f55 ran for 0 msecs: netpoll_init+0x0/0x39()
 Calling initcall 0xc0604257: netlink_proto_init+0x0/0x12a()
 NET: Registered protocol family 16

and no output ever since - and the box has been up for a few minutes.

> So, can you verify whether there are any interrupts arriving on the 
> NIC after the network got wedged? You could also try ethtool -s eth0 
> msglevel 65535 - would be interesting to see what dmesg contains. If 
> there's little to no debug output from the driver, let it run for 10 
> seconds or so, in order to catch the e1000 watchdog timer a few times.

eth0's irq count is stuck at 5 interrupts - and has not changed for 
minutes.

i tried ethtool -s eth0 msglvl 65535, but (sa expected) there's no 
output. I've attached below ifconfig output and ethtool -S output - 
maybe that tells you something new about the state of eth0. (to me it 
only tells what we already know: tx timed out once and eth0 is stuck 
ever since.)

Btw., i definitely need your help with this bug as it's now hopelessly 
out of my league :-/

	Ingo

------------------>
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:16:41:17:49:D2
          inet addr:10.0.1.15  Bcast:10.255.255.255  Mask:255.0.0.0
          UP BROADCAST MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:873 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:87076 (85.0 KiB)
          Base address:0x2000 Memory:ee000000-ee020000 

NIC statistics:
     rx_packets: 0
     tx_packets: 873
     rx_bytes: 0
     tx_bytes: 87076
     rx_broadcast: 0
     tx_broadcast: 0
     rx_multicast: 0
     tx_multicast: 0
     rx_errors: 0
     tx_errors: 0
     tx_dropped: 0
     multicast: 0
     collisions: 0
     rx_length_errors: 0
     rx_over_errors: 0
     rx_crc_errors: 0
     rx_frame_errors: 0
     rx_no_buffer_count: 0
     rx_missed_errors: 0
     tx_aborted_errors: 0
     tx_carrier_errors: 0
     tx_fifo_errors: 0
     tx_heartbeat_errors: 0
     tx_window_errors: 0
     tx_abort_late_coll: 0
     tx_deferred_ok: 0
     tx_single_coll_ok: 0
     tx_multi_coll_ok: 0
     tx_timeout_count: 1
     tx_restart_queue: 0
     rx_long_length_errors: 0
     rx_short_length_errors: 0
     rx_align_errors: 0
     tx_tcp_seg_good: 0
     tx_tcp_seg_failed: 0
     rx_flow_control_xon: 0
     rx_flow_control_xoff: 0
     tx_flow_control_xon: 0
     tx_flow_control_xoff: 0
     rx_long_byte_count: 0
     rx_csum_offload_good: 0
     rx_csum_offload_errors: 0
     rx_header_split: 0
     alloc_rx_buff_failed: 0
     tx_smbus: 0
     rx_smbus: 0
     dropped_smbus: 0

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-19 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-16  9:12 [patch] revert: [NET]: Fix races in net_rx_action vs netpoll Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 10:35 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-16 11:26 ` David Miller
2007-07-16 12:18   ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-16 13:29     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 21:09   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 22:06     ` David Miller
2007-07-16 21:40   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-16 21:51     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 22:09       ` David Miller
2007-07-16 22:37         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 22:57           ` David Miller
2007-07-17 18:09             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 22:08     ` David Miller
2007-07-16 22:29       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-16 22:52         ` David Miller
2007-07-16 23:17         ` Matt Mackall
2007-07-16 23:34           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-17  7:37       ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17  8:16     ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17  5:46 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-17  6:14   ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-17  7:55     ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17  8:28       ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17  8:57         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17  9:29           ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-17 14:07           ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 16:57             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 18:06               ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 18:18                 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 18:34                   ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 18:56                     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 12:04                       ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-18 12:41                         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 12:48                         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 14:41                           ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-18 16:43                             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19  9:09                               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19  9:44                                 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 10:01                                   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-07-19 10:37                                     ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 10:47                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 10:58                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 12:52                                           ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 12:54                                             ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 15:42                                             ` Kok, Auke
2007-07-19 16:07                                               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 19:13                                                 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 19:22                                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 19:35                                                     ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 19:56                                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 20:02                                                         ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-20  9:45                                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 15:07                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 15:27                                             ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 15:32                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 15:52                                               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 16:05                                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 16:13                                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 17:36                                                   ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 17:41                                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 17:51                                                     ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 10:17                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 11:48                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-19  5:58                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-17 17:49           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-17  9:12         ` Jarek Poplawski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070719100135.GA2986@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olaf.kirch@oracle.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox