From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Jan Glauber <jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mschwid2@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
efault@gmx.de, dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org,
anton@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:00:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070719160025.GA31815@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <469F8342.7060000@goop.org>
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> > /*
> > - * Monotonic_clock - returns # of nanoseconds passed since time_init()
> > + * Scheduler clock - returns current time in nanosec units.
> > + * Now based on virtual cpu time to only account time the guest
> > + * was actually running.
>
> Runn*ing*? Does it include time the VCPU spends idle/blocked? If
> not, then the scheduler won't be able to tell how long a process has
> been asleep. Maybe this doesn't matter (I had this problem in a
> version of Xen's sched_clock, and I can't say I saw an ill effects
> from it).
CFS does measure time elapsed across task-sleep periods (and does
something similar to what the old scheduler's 'sleep average'
interactivity mechanism did), but that mechanism measures "time spent
running during sleep", not "time spent idling".
still, CFS needs time measurement across idle periods as well, for
another purpose: to be able to do precise task statistics for /proc.
(for top, ps, etc.) So it's still true that sched_clock() should include
idle periods too.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-19 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-19 10:57 [PATCH] virtual sched_clock() for s390 Jan Glauber
2007-07-19 15:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-19 15:48 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-07-19 16:00 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-07-19 19:20 ` Jan Glauber
2007-07-19 19:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 21:07 ` Jan Glauber
2007-07-20 1:01 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-07-20 6:03 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-20 7:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-23 9:15 ` Jan Glauber
2007-07-23 13:24 ` Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070719160025.GA31815@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mschwid2@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox