From: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: "Ken'ichi Ohmichi" <oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp>,
vgoyal@in.ibm.com, Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Aloni <da-x@monatomic.org>
Subject: Re: Determine version of kernel that produced vmcore
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:49:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070719164953.GA5381@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070719163915.GN9623@redhat.com>
* Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> [2007-07-19 18:39]:
>
> I am not a big fan of this approach as it forces distros to require
> kexec-tools when building a kernel. Even Joe Hacker who wants a custom
> kernel (and not interested in kexec) would have to not only download the
> kernel.src.rpm but kexec-tools just to build a kernel that probably
> doesn't have kexec enabled.
He would have to download makedumpfile, not kexec-tools.
Thanks,
Bernhard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-19 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-06 13:28 Determine version of kernel that produced vmcore Bernhard Walle
2007-07-06 14:58 ` Dan Aloni
2007-07-09 9:21 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-09 11:41 ` Dan Aloni
2007-07-09 20:49 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-10 4:45 ` Dan Aloni
2007-07-10 13:20 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-10 15:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-07-10 17:17 ` Neil Horman
2007-07-10 17:35 ` Dan Aloni
2007-07-10 18:26 ` Dan Aloni
2007-07-10 19:00 ` Neil Horman
2007-07-10 20:36 ` Dan Aloni
2007-07-11 11:57 ` Neil Horman
2007-07-10 6:48 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-07-10 8:14 ` Dan Aloni
2007-07-10 12:12 ` Neil Horman
2007-07-10 13:05 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-10 12:09 ` Neil Horman
2007-07-10 16:52 ` Dan Aloni
2007-07-11 6:07 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-07-11 7:32 ` Dan Aloni
2007-07-11 13:43 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2007-07-13 3:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-07-13 7:49 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-13 3:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-07-11 8:58 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-10 3:13 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2007-07-10 12:02 ` Neil Horman
2007-07-13 11:05 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2007-07-13 13:15 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-16 4:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-07-16 11:57 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-16 12:25 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-07-16 12:27 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-16 12:28 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-16 12:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-07-18 14:07 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2007-07-18 23:10 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-24 6:49 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2007-07-19 14:12 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-07-19 16:39 ` Don Zickus
2007-07-19 16:49 ` Bernhard Walle [this message]
2007-07-19 16:59 ` Don Zickus
2007-07-23 5:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-07-23 11:47 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2007-07-23 13:02 ` Dan Aloni
2007-07-23 15:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-07-24 6:40 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2007-07-17 3:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-07-17 8:17 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-10 12:52 ` Bernhard Walle
2007-07-10 6:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-07-10 12:59 ` Bernhard Walle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070719164953.GA5381@suse.de \
--to=bwalle@suse.de \
--cc=da-x@monatomic.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox