From: Olaf Kirch <olaf.kirch@oracle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [patch] revert: [NET]: Fix races in net_rx_action vs netpoll
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:13:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707192113.26878.olaf.kirch@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070719160713.GA3807@elte.hu>
On Thursday 19 July 2007 18:07, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> because i dont seem to be able to trigger Olaf's WARN_ON(), can you see
> anything in the ethtool output that i sent in the previous mail(s)?
If the WARN_ON doesn't trigger, I cannot see how my patch would affect
your system.
- IF we enter the if() branch in poll_napi, then the following
must hold:
- an interrupt from the e1000 arrived
- e1000_intr disables interrupts, increments irq_sem
(which is now 1) and schedules rx_action
- Now, inside poll_napi, the following happens:
- poll_napi is called, finds the device is marked for
polling, invokes dev->poll
- dev->poll calls netif_rx_complete (which does *not*
remove the device from the poll list), and re-enables
interrupts. irq_sem is now 0.
- Finally, the rx_action softirq is run, which calls dev->poll
again, which ends up invoking netif_rx_complete once more,
and tries to re-enable interrupts. The latter doesn't do
anything except decrementing irq_sem once more, which now
goes negative.
Which would trigger the WARN_ON.
Now, as you say the WARN_ON is never triggered, it follows that
we never end up in the if() branch of poll_napi. But that is
where the only substantial modification of my patch is.
Here's a somewhat drastic modification that should not change any
timing, but just verifies whether my patch is to blame at all. Can
you give it a try?
Thanks,
Olaf
--
Olaf Kirch | --- o --- Nous sommes du soleil we love when we play
okir@lst.de | / | \ sol.dhoop.naytheet.ah kin.ir.samse.qurax
---
Test patch
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: build-2.6/include/linux/netdevice.h
===================================================================
--- build-2.6.orig/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ build-2.6/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -1027,7 +1027,7 @@ static inline void netif_rx_complete(str
* But at least it doesn't penalize the non-netpoll
* code path. */
if (test_bit(__LINK_STATE_POLL_LIST_FROZEN, &dev->state))
- return;
+ BUG();
#endif
local_irq_save(flags);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-19 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-16 9:12 [patch] revert: [NET]: Fix races in net_rx_action vs netpoll Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 10:35 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-16 11:26 ` David Miller
2007-07-16 12:18 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-16 13:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 21:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 22:06 ` David Miller
2007-07-16 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-16 21:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 22:09 ` David Miller
2007-07-16 22:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 22:57 ` David Miller
2007-07-17 18:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 22:08 ` David Miller
2007-07-16 22:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-16 22:52 ` David Miller
2007-07-16 23:17 ` Matt Mackall
2007-07-16 23:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-17 7:37 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 8:16 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 5:46 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-17 6:14 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-17 7:55 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 8:28 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 9:29 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-17 14:07 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 16:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 18:06 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 18:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 18:34 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-17 18:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 12:04 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-18 12:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 12:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 14:41 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-18 16:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 9:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 9:44 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 10:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 10:37 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 10:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 10:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 12:52 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 12:54 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 15:42 ` Kok, Auke
2007-07-19 16:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 19:13 ` Olaf Kirch [this message]
2007-07-19 19:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 19:35 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 19:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 20:02 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-20 9:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 15:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 15:27 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 15:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 15:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 16:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 17:36 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 17:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 17:51 ` Olaf Kirch
2007-07-19 10:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 11:48 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-19 5:58 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-17 17:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-17 9:12 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200707192113.26878.olaf.kirch@oracle.com \
--to=olaf.kirch@oracle.com \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox