From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764807AbXGTOKL (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:10:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760640AbXGTOJ6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:09:58 -0400 Received: from [198.99.130.12] ([198.99.130.12]:52584 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750768AbXGTOJ6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:09:58 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:09:06 -0400 From: Jeff Dike To: Zachary Amsden Cc: Rusty Russell , Avi Kivity , lkml - Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , virtualization , Jeff Dike Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move KVM, paravirt, lguest, VMI and Xen under arch-level Virtualization option Message-ID: <20070720140906.GB6534@c2.user-mode-linux.org> References: <1184905342.10380.263.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46A046F1.7040207@qumranet.com> <1184911347.10380.274.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46A051EE.7060304@vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46A051EE.7060304@vmware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 11:10:54PM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote: > I'm rather indifferent on the matter, but I think a virtualization menu > under UML would be very confusing. Yeah, that would be interesting. Trying to get one menu, with switches that the arch can turn on and off, seems to make sense if you can get away without too many switches. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com