From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763682AbXGUF5U (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2007 01:57:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756466AbXGUF5J (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2007 01:57:09 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:59058 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755259AbXGUF5I (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2007 01:57:08 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 07:57:06 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Fengguang Wu , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] compacting file_ra_state Message-ID: <20070721055706.GA5097@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20070721035733.951838089@mail.ustc.edu.cn> <20070721035850.977231489@mail.ustc.edu.cn> <384990797.09024@ustc.edu.cn> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 09:27:01PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Sat, 21 Jul 2007, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > > > Sorry, forgot to prefix the patch titles with [readahead]. > > Should I repost? > > Not for me, but on the other hand, I'd prefer for this to be in -mm a bit, Haven't the readahead patches already essentially been in -mm* for some time? I thought the new patches were some some restructured code, but essentially the tested algorithms? -Andi