From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937677AbXGUIdj (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2007 04:33:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760971AbXGUIda (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2007 04:33:30 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:36911 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753079AbXGUId3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2007 04:33:29 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 10:32:51 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andi Kleen Cc: Adrian Bunk , Steven Rostedt , Michal Piotrowski , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven , Chris Wright Subject: Re: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86 Message-ID: <20070721083251.GA373@elte.hu> References: <1184970779.4012.38.camel@chaos> <200707210806.12880.ak@suse.de> <20070721073533.GE3801@stusta.de> <200707210942.48444.ak@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200707210942.48444.ak@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -1.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andi Kleen wrote: > > It happens so often that someone accidentally breaks one > > architecture because he didn't notice the code also gets used on the > > other architecture. > > That's not changing at all. Especially with even more sharing, (than I > think would be prudent) like Thomas treated, you'll likely have to > test compile both for most changes. yes, very much so, and that's exactly one of our points. Ingo