Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570

[Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>]

On Saturday 21 July 2007 18:00:52 Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi Andi,
> 
> On 21/07/07, Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 7/21/07, Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Satyam Sharma pisze:
> > > > [...]
> > > > Gargh! My system obviously cannot boot without libata. Guess it's
> > > > time to go through git log and see how to fix that build breakage
> > > > myself ...
> > > >
> > > > Michal, how did you even manage to build / boot this kernel!
> > >
> > > I commented origin.patch and mm.patch in series file, reverted xfs patches,
> > > fixed libata build, deselected unionfs.
> > >
> > > Here is a patch for libata
> > >
> > > --- linux-work3-clean/drivers/ata/libata-core.c 2007-07-20 16:53:26.000000000 +0200
> > > +++ linux-work3/drivers/ata/libata-core.c       2007-07-20 17:26:30.000000000 +0200
> > > @@ -2036,7 +2036,7 @@ int ata_dev_configure(struct ata_device
> > >                 dev->max_sectors = min_t(unsigned int, ATA_MAX_SECTORS_128,
> > >                                          dev->max_sectors);
> > >
> > > -       if (ata_device_blacklisted(dev) & ATA_HORKAGE_ALPM) {
> > > +       if (ata_dev_blacklisted(dev) & ATA_HORKAGE_ALPM) {
> > >                 dev->horkage |= ATA_HORKAGE_ALPM;
> > >
> > >                 /* reset link pm_policy for this port to no pm */
> >
> >
> > And to think I went through all those hoops just to avoid *this* ... :-(
> > Anyway, please apply the attached patch and let's verify if we're both
> > actually bit by the same bug. A screenshot of my case is available at:
> >
> > http://www.cse.iitk.ac.in/users/ssatyam/mtrr.show-bug.jpg
> 
> Yep, the same bug here.
> 
> My hunt file shows me this
> 
> GOOD
> x86_64-mm-i386-string-out-of-line.patch
> BAD
> 
> Andi?


Does it still happen with the i386-string-out-of-line version from
firstfloor.org:/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt/patches/ ? 

I fixed some issues there.

-Andi