From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759075AbXGUQlw (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:41:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750928AbXGUQlp (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:41:45 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59836 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750767AbXGUQlo (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:41:44 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) To: "Michal Piotrowski" Subject: Re: [broken-out-2007-07-20-00-22] kernel bug at kernel/params:570 Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:41:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: "Satyam Sharma" , "Greg KH" , "Andrew Morton" , rdunlap@xenotime.net, LKML References: <6bffcb0e0707200932p2b905e21g7970172ca7eb4da7@mail.gmail.com> <6bffcb0e0707210900h505f04aaq98e0f4b17139d94b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6bffcb0e0707210900h505f04aaq98e0f4b17139d94b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200707211841.39339.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 21 July 2007 18:00:52 Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi Andi, > > On 21/07/07, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > On 7/21/07, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > > Satyam Sharma pisze: > > > > [...] > > > > Gargh! My system obviously cannot boot without libata. Guess it's > > > > time to go through git log and see how to fix that build breakage > > > > myself ... > > > > > > > > Michal, how did you even manage to build / boot this kernel! > > > > > > I commented origin.patch and mm.patch in series file, reverted xfs patches, > > > fixed libata build, deselected unionfs. > > > > > > Here is a patch for libata > > > > > > --- linux-work3-clean/drivers/ata/libata-core.c 2007-07-20 16:53:26.000000000 +0200 > > > +++ linux-work3/drivers/ata/libata-core.c 2007-07-20 17:26:30.000000000 +0200 > > > @@ -2036,7 +2036,7 @@ int ata_dev_configure(struct ata_device > > > dev->max_sectors = min_t(unsigned int, ATA_MAX_SECTORS_128, > > > dev->max_sectors); > > > > > > - if (ata_device_blacklisted(dev) & ATA_HORKAGE_ALPM) { > > > + if (ata_dev_blacklisted(dev) & ATA_HORKAGE_ALPM) { > > > dev->horkage |= ATA_HORKAGE_ALPM; > > > > > > /* reset link pm_policy for this port to no pm */ > > > > > > And to think I went through all those hoops just to avoid *this* ... :-( > > Anyway, please apply the attached patch and let's verify if we're both > > actually bit by the same bug. A screenshot of my case is available at: > > > > http://www.cse.iitk.ac.in/users/ssatyam/mtrr.show-bug.jpg > > Yep, the same bug here. > > My hunt file shows me this > > GOOD > x86_64-mm-i386-string-out-of-line.patch > BAD > > Andi? Does it still happen with the i386-string-out-of-line version from firstfloor.org:/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt/patches/ ? I fixed some issues there. -Andi