Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1

Ingo Molnar
2007-07-30T06:44:47Z

* George Sescher <gesacs@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 30/07/07, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > i'd encourage you to do it - in fact i already tried to prod Peter
> > Williams into doing exactly that ;) The more reality checks a
> > scheduler has, the better. [ Btw., after the obvious initial merging
> > trouble it should be much easier to keep SD maintained against
> > future upstream kernels due to the policy modularity that CFS
> > introduces. (and which policy-modularity should also help reduce the
> > size and complexity of the SD patch.) ]
>
> <chuckle>
>
> You're advocating plugsched now?

hm, the way you posited this question implies that you see an
inconsistency in my position or that it surprised you - i cannot explain
the '<chuckle>' in any other way :) Which bit do you see as inconsistent
and/or which bit surprised you and why?

Ingo