Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

Kenneth Prugh
2007-07-30T17:55:27Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 416 bytes --]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> <large snip>

Hello, I have a gaming rig and would love to help benchmark with my copy
of UT2004(E6600 Core2 and a 7950GTO card). Or if you have anything else
that would better serve as a benchmark I could grab it and try.

The only problem is I don't know what 2 kernels I should be using to
test the schedulers. I assume 2.6.23-rc1 for CFS, but what about SD?

--
Kenneth Prugh

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]