From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "build-id" changes break sparc64
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:24:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070723082423.GC4644@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070723081814.846B64D058D@magilla.localdomain>
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:18:14AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > -cmd_link_multi-m = $(LD) $(ld_flags) $(LDFLAGS_MODULE) -o $@ $(link_multi_deps)
> > > +cmd_link_multi-m = $(cmd_link_multi-y)
> > This signel change looks wrong. We do not want to generate a linker
> > script for modules.
>
> multi-m has nothing to do with modules, really. It's just for another
> "built-in.o"-style object that happens to be the input for a .ko link
> rather than the vmlinux link.
OK - so even in that case we should defer to the link script trick - OK.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-23 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-22 8:23 "build-id" changes break sparc64 David Miller
2007-07-22 8:59 ` Roland McGrath
2007-07-23 2:18 ` David Miller
2007-07-23 6:01 ` Roland McGrath
2007-07-23 6:13 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-07-23 6:27 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-07-23 7:26 ` Roland McGrath
2007-07-23 8:14 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-07-23 8:18 ` Roland McGrath
2007-07-23 8:24 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2007-07-23 9:25 ` Alan Modra
2007-07-23 11:49 ` Al Viro
2007-07-23 18:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-07-23 18:56 ` Al Viro
2007-07-23 19:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-23 19:12 ` Roland McGrath
2007-07-23 19:39 ` Al Viro
2007-07-23 20:05 ` Roland McGrath
2007-07-23 20:33 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-07-23 6:14 ` [PATCH] Move --build-id option Roland McGrath
2007-07-23 6:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-07-23 8:09 ` Roland McGrath
2007-07-23 8:12 ` [PATCH] Use LDFLAGS_MODULE only for .ko links Roland McGrath
2007-07-23 8:16 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-07-23 6:22 ` "build-id" changes break sparc64 Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070723082423.GC4644@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=amodra@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox