From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>,
Kyle Moffett <mrlinuxman@mac.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [DRIVER SUBMISSION] DRBD wants to go mainline
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:37:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070723133704.GN11657@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070723133202.GB23495@mail.linbit.com>
On Mon, Jul 23 2007, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > +/* THINK maybe we actually want to use the default "event/%s" worker threads
> > + * or similar in linux 2.6, which uses per cpu data and threads.
> > + *
> > + * To be general, this might need a spin_lock member.
> > + * For now, please use the mdev->req_lock to protect list_head,
> > + * see drbd_queue_work below.
> > + */
> > +struct drbd_work_queue {
> > + struct list_head q;
> > + struct semaphore s; /* producers up it, worker down()s it */
> > + spinlock_t q_lock; /* to protect the list. */
> > +};
> >
> > Umm, how about fixing this to actually use proper workqueues or something
> > instead of this open-coded mess?
>
> unlikely to happen "right now".
> but it is on our todo list...
But stuff like that is definitely a merge show stopper, jfyi.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-23 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-21 20:38 [DRIVER SUBMISSION] DRBD wants to go mainline Lars Ellenberg
2007-07-21 21:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-21 22:43 ` Lars Ellenberg
2007-07-22 9:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-22 14:03 ` Lars Ellenberg
2007-07-27 18:46 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-30 19:35 ` Lars Ellenberg
2007-07-30 19:41 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-21 21:34 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-07-21 23:50 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-22 5:52 ` Jens Axboe
2007-07-22 13:58 ` Lars Ellenberg
2007-07-22 14:49 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-07-22 14:56 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-22 15:31 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-22 15:50 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-22 16:13 ` Stefan Richter
2007-07-22 6:09 ` Lars Ellenberg
2007-07-22 8:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-07-22 9:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-07-22 9:00 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-07-23 1:32 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-07-23 8:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-23 9:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-07-23 9:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-23 9:19 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-07-23 11:08 ` Lars Ellenberg
2007-07-23 13:32 ` Lars Ellenberg
2007-07-23 13:37 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2007-07-23 21:13 ` Lars Ellenberg
2007-07-23 13:40 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 21:19 ` Lars Ellenberg
2007-07-24 7:36 ` Jens Axboe
2007-07-24 23:11 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-25 9:46 ` Lars Ellenberg
2007-07-25 12:12 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-26 2:03 ` david
2007-07-26 3:43 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-07-26 9:17 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-07-24 0:48 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-07-23 20:59 ` Jesper Juhl
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-22 9:54 Tomasz Chmielewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070723133704.GN11657@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mrlinuxman@mac.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox