From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755893AbXGWUHm (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:07:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757673AbXGWUHd (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:07:33 -0400 Received: from [198.99.130.12] ([198.99.130.12]:37178 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755579AbXGWUHc (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:07:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:06:59 -0400 From: Jeff Dike To: Avi Kivity Cc: Shaohua Li , kvm-devel , lkml , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8]KVM: swap out guest pages Message-ID: <20070723200659.GA13508@c2.user-mode-linux.org> References: <1185173489.2645.64.camel@sli10-conroe.sh.intel.com> <46A4829C.9080104@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46A4829C.9080104@qumranet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 01:27:40PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > Having an address_space (like your patch does) is remarkably simple, and > requires few hooks from the current vm. However using existing vmas > mapped by the user has many advantages: It's also needed for a SKAS-like UML client, where the host side will need to make system calls on behalf of the guest. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com