From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Agarwal, Lomesh" <lomesh.agarwal@intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
nigel@suspend2.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: which signal is sent to freeze process?
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:54:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070724165452.GA24151@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A3258B497F1C1441AD36A2E8B45FD62858D5AE@scsmsx412.amr.corp.intel.com>
Hi!
Can you generate small testcase that demonstrates the problem?
> Then what would be the correct way to handle resume process. The other
> way of course is to make all the applications check the errno in case of
> failure. But that seems more more problematic then system call checking.
> What do you say?
Hmm, does that testcase behave correctly over SIGSTOP/SIGCONT? I'm not
saying kernel behaves nicely here, but perhaps fixing the apps to
check errno properly is the right thing to do? :-)
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-24 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-18 23:42 which signal is sent to freeze process? Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-19 2:18 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-19 4:09 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-19 4:59 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-19 21:06 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-19 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-19 22:19 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-19 23:22 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-20 11:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-20 18:07 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-20 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-23 18:38 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-23 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-23 19:31 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-24 16:54 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-07-23 20:57 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-23 21:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-23 22:18 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-24 9:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-19 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-25 13:41 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-23 19:52 Manfred Spraul
2007-07-23 20:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-23 20:09 ` Manfred Spraul
2007-07-24 18:48 ` Manfred Spraul
2007-07-25 19:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-26 21:12 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-31 7:55 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070724165452.GA24151@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lomesh.agarwal@intel.com \
--cc=nigel@suspend2.net \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox