From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1765625AbXGZIqT@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1765625AbXGZIqT (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:46:19 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755798AbXGZIqL
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:46:11 -0400
Received: from mx2.go2.pl ([193.17.41.42]:35212 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754749AbXGZIqJ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:46:09 -0400
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:55:23 +0200
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       Marcin ??lusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Jean-Baptiste Vignaud <vignaud@xandmail.fr>,
       linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       shemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
       linux-net <linux-net@vger.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20->2.6.21 - networking dies after random time
Message-ID: <20070726085523.GA3423@ff.dom.local>
References: <4bacf17f0707222244p664e7a6ap850b3357a57d73c@mail.gmail.com> <20070724080534.GC18740@elte.hu> <20070724094202.GA11610@elte.hu> <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707241228291.3607@woody.linux-foundation.org> <20070724200431.GA22190@elte.hu> <1185322771.4175.102.camel@chaos> <4bacf17f0707260016x14fc1c92s628ae64353663833@mail.gmail.com> <20070726081326.GA3197@ff.dom.local> <1185437431.3227.21.camel@chaos> <20070726083120.GA26910@elte.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070726083120.GA26910@elte.hu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:31:20AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
...
> yeah. The patch below enables sw-resend on x86, to test the theory 
> whether the APIC-driven hardware-vector-resend code has some problem.

I think Marcin is using x86_64 (Athlon 64) yet.

Jarek P.