From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Tong Li <tong.n.li@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] scheduler: improve SMP fairness in CFS
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:31:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070726213154.GA26569@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707261123060.9352@tongli.jf.intel.com>
* Tong Li <tong.n.li@intel.com> wrote:
> > you need to measure it over longer periods of time. Its not worth
> > balancing for such a thing in any high-frequency manner. (we'd trash
> > the cache constantly migrating tasks back and forth.)
>
> I have some data below, but before that, I'd like to say, at the same
> load balancing rate, my proposed approach would allow us to have
> fairness on the order of seconds. I'm less concerned about trashing
> the cache. The important thing is to have a knob that allow users to
> trade off fairness and performance based on their needs. [...]
such a knob already exists to a certain degree, but i havent tested its
full effects on SMP fairness yet. If you pull my scheduler tree:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched.git
and if you enable CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG, then all the sched-domain
parameters become runtime tunable under /proc/sys/cpu*.
Could you try to increase the cross-CPU rebalancing frequency and see
how it impacts the precision of your measurement? Tune 'min_interval'
and 'max_interval' down to increase the frequency of rebalancing.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-26 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-23 18:38 [RFC] scheduler: improve SMP fairness in CFS Tong Li
2007-07-23 20:00 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 21:10 ` Li, Tong N
2007-07-23 21:25 ` Chris Friesen
2007-07-24 9:43 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 23:40 ` Chris Snook
2007-07-24 8:07 ` Chris Snook
2007-07-24 17:11 ` Li, Tong N
2007-07-24 17:07 ` Tong Li
2007-07-24 18:08 ` Chris Snook
2007-07-24 19:47 ` Chris Friesen
2007-07-24 20:39 ` Chris Snook
2007-07-24 20:58 ` Li, Tong N
2007-07-24 21:09 ` Chris Snook
2007-07-24 21:23 ` Chris Friesen
2007-07-24 21:45 ` Chris Snook
2007-07-24 23:33 ` Chris Friesen
2007-07-24 21:06 ` Bill Huey
2007-07-24 21:22 ` Chris Snook
2007-07-24 23:14 ` Bill Huey
2007-07-24 21:12 ` Chris Friesen
2007-07-25 11:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-25 12:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-25 17:23 ` Tong Li
2007-07-25 19:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-25 20:38 ` Chris Friesen
2007-07-25 20:55 ` Chris Snook
2007-07-25 21:15 ` Li, Tong N
2007-07-25 22:24 ` Chris Snook
2007-07-26 19:00 ` Tong Li
2007-07-26 21:31 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-07-26 22:00 ` Li, Tong N
2007-07-27 1:34 ` Tong Li
2007-07-27 17:16 ` Chris Snook
2007-07-27 19:03 ` Tong Li
2007-07-27 22:20 ` Bill Huey
2007-07-27 23:36 ` Chris Snook
2007-07-28 0:54 ` Bill Huey
2007-07-28 2:59 ` Chris Snook
2007-07-28 19:38 ` Tong Li
2007-07-29 2:40 ` Chris Snook
2007-07-28 19:23 ` Tong Li
2007-07-29 3:01 ` Chris Snook
2007-07-25 18:20 ` Li, Tong N
2007-07-25 19:18 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070726213154.GA26569@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=csnook@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tong.n.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox