public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Danny ter Haar <dth@dth.net>
To: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Update: ide problems: 2.6.22-git17 working, 2.6.23-rc1* is not:
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:54:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070730025412.GA22888@dth.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46AC0F6E.2000008@googlemail.com>

Quoting Gabriel C (nix.or.die@googlemail.com):
> Now while we think is ACPI this should be easy for you to bisect.
> This commit http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=39804b20f62532fa05c2a8c3e2d1ae551fd0327b
> merged ACPI so this one should be your first bad one.
> Maybe Len has some idea and you don't need to bisect :)

Thanks to personal coaching of Gabriel i bisected the last few days.

It looked like this was the cullprit:

22aadf8a07067644e101267ed5003043f2ad05bf is first bad commit

2.6.23-rc1-git[1-6] all lockup solid after either direct or
within a couple of minutes (less than 2) after reboot.

They all run fine with "acpi=off" as boot argument.


However, i'm currently running 2.6.23-rc1-git6 with this reverted:

diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 18c8b67..6f846be 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -665,8 +665,8 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
        data->max_freq = perf->states[0].core_frequency * 1000;
        /* table init */
        for (i=0; i<perf->state_count; i++) {
-               if (i>0 && perf->states[i].core_frequency ==
-                   perf->states[i-1].core_frequency)
+               if (i>0 && perf->states[i].core_frequency >=
+                   data->freq_table[valid_states-1].frequency / 1000)
                        continue;

-----------

I could hardly believe this could be the cause.
And indeed after about 16 minutes the kernel froze again, though longer
uptime than other kernels :-(

This hardware is a via epia 5000 with latest bios available (2.07)

It's remarkable that with acpi=off the machine is rocksolid.
As is with 2.6.22* kernels _with_ acpi enabled!
weeks of uptime before i wanted to upgrade to a new kernel ;-)

I'm thinking of redoing the git disect but this time really powercycle
the unit between kernels since it "seems/feels" like a timer which 
really counts to 0 and then locks the machine. 
After a lockup/freeze i cant boot the kernel another time with acpi 
enabled: it will simply hang after booting init.
And again nobody home: no keyboard activity whatsoever.

I've put the dmesg of 2.6.23-rc1-git6 with and without acpi=off online:
http://www.dth.net/kernel/via_output_2.6.23-rc1-git6-acpi_off
http://www.dth.net/kernel/via_output_2.6.23-rc1-git6-acpi_on

I would like to hear if someone has an idea how to tackle this problem.

Danny
-- 

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-30  2:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-27 19:38 ide problems: 2.6.22-git17 working, 2.6.23-rc1* is not dth
2007-07-28 23:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-07-29  0:30   ` Danny ter Haar
2007-07-29  1:23   ` Danny ter Haar
2007-07-29  2:48     ` Gabriel C
2007-07-29  3:30       ` Danny ter Haar
2007-07-29  3:54         ` Gabriel C
2007-07-30  2:54           ` Danny ter Haar [this message]
2007-07-30 17:30             ` Update: ide problems: 2.6.22-git17 working, 2.6.23-rc1* is not: Len Brown
2007-07-31  1:10               ` Danny ter Haar
2007-07-31  4:00               ` Danny ter Haar
2007-07-31 14:30               ` Danny ter Haar
2007-08-01  0:44               ` Danny ter Haar
2007-08-01 20:03               ` Update: ACPI problems: 2.6.22-git17 working, 2.6.23-rc1* is not: (was ide not working) Danny ter Haar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070730025412.GA22888@dth.net \
    --to=dth@dth.net \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nix.or.die@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox