From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] i386 relocable kernel breakes /proc/kcore debugging
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:32:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707301232.01989.maximlevitsky@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070730084116.GA18263@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
On Monday 30 July 2007 11:41, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:03:03 +0200, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 04:43:43AM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > gdb 'thinks' that all kernel symbols are below 0x80000000 , while they
> > > are at 0xC000....
> > >
> > > Turning CONFIG_RELOCATABLE off fixes that, so I assume that is the
> > > reason for that.
> >
> > This is a gdb issue. I had raised it in gdb mailing list some time back.
> >
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2006-08/msg00137.html
>
> There was the patch post:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2006-08/msg00182.html
>
> > What version of gdb you are using? I know it got fixed for gdb shipped
> > with RHEL5. I am not sure about what upstream version of gdb it got fixed
> > in.
>
> It did not make it to the upstream as the patch above is an imperfect one.
> It is fixed in RH gdb-6.5-5 upwards, therefore Fedora 6 + RHEL-5.
> http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/devel/gdb/gdb-6.5-bz203661
>-emit-relocs.patch?root=core
>
>
> Regards,
> Jan
Hi,
I am using mandriva 2007 and gdb that come with it ( 6.3 I think)
I also compiled gdb 6.6, but the same issue persist.
Thanks for the info, and I will try to apply the above patch and see if helps,
Will it make into gdb?
By the way, I had another issue with /proc/kcore.
That enabling sparse memory model instead of flat causes /proc/kcore not to
work at all. I traced that to a "FIXME" in sparcemem.
/* XXX: FIXME -- wli */
#define kern_addr_valid(kaddr) (0)
Kconfig should contatin a warning for those who select sparcemem
that /proc/kcore will be disabled.
or maybe this should be implemented (it is not easy since spacemem allows
memory to be discontinous, and nobody wants to allow user to read reserved
regions)
Except the above, /proc/kcore works fine, and it is very usefull.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-30 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200707280443.44048.maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
2007-07-28 1:58 ` [BUG] i386 relocable kernel breakes /proc/kcore debugging Eric W. Biederman
2007-07-30 8:03 ` Vivek Goyal
2007-07-30 8:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
2007-07-30 9:32 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2007-07-30 14:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200707301232.01989.maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
--to=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox