public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 12/26] ext2 white-out support
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:45:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070731034515.GD25876@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070730161324.261652101@weierstrass.suse.de>

On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 06:13:35PM +0200, Jan Blunck wrote:
> Introduce white-out support to ext2.
> 
> Known Bugs:
> - Needs a reserved inode number for white-outs

You picked different reserved inodes for the ext2 and ext3
filesystems.  That's good for a NACK right there.  The codepoints
(i.e., reserved inode numbers, feature bit masks, etc.) for ext2,
ext3, and ext4 MUST not overlap.  After all, someone might use tune2fs
-j to convert an ext2 filesystem to ext3, and is it's REALLY BAD that
you're using a reserved inode of 7 for ext2, and 9 for ext3.

Also, I note that you have created a new INCOMPAT feature flag support
for whiteouts.  That's really unfortunate; we try to avoid introducing
incompatible feature flags unless absolutely necessary; note that even
adding a COMPAT feature flag means that you need a new version of
e2fsprogs if you want e2fsck to be willing to touch that filesystem.

So --- if you're looking for a way to add whiteout support to
ext2/ext3 without needing a feature bit, here's how.  We allocate a
new inode flag in struct ext3_inode.i_flags:

#define EXT2_WHTOUT_FL	 0x00040000

We also allocate a new field in the ext2 superblock to store the
"whiteout inode".  (Please coordinate with me so it's a superblock
field not in use by ext3/ext4, and so it's reserved so that no one
else uses it.)  The superblock field, call it s_whtout_ino, stores the
inode number for the "white out inode".

When you create a new whiteout file, the code checks sb->s_whtout_ino,
and if it is zero, it allocates a new inode, and creates it as a
zero-length regular file (i_mode |= S_IFREG) with the EXT2_WHTOUT_FL
flag set in the inode, and then store the inode number in
sb->s_whtout_ino.  If sb->s_whtout_ino is non-zero, you must read in
the inode and make sure that the EXT2_WHTOUT_FL is set.  If it is not,
then allocate a new whiteout inode as described previously.  Then link
the inode into the directory as before.

When reading an inode, if the EXT2_WHTOUT_FL flag is set, then set the
in-memory mode of the inode to be S_IFWHT.  

That's pretty much about it.  For cleanliness sake, it would be good
if ext2_delete_inode clears sb->s_whtout_ino if the last whiteout link
has been deleted, but it's strictly speaking not necessary.  If you do
it this way, the filesystem is completely backwards compatible; the
whiteout files will just appear to links to a normal zero-lenth file.

I wouldn't bother with setting the directory type field to be DT_WHT,
given that they will never be returned to userspace anyway.

Regards,

						- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-31  3:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-30 16:13 [RFC 00/26] VFS based Union Mount (V2) Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 01/26] [PATCH 14/18] shmem: convert to using splice instead of sendfile() Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 02/26] VFS: Export dput_path() and path_to_nameidata() Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 03/26] VFS: Make lookup_hash() return a struct path Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 04/26] VFS: Make lookup_create() " Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 05/26] VFS: cache_lookup() cleanup Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 06/26] VFS: Make real_lookup() return a struct path Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 07/26] VFS: Introduce dput() variante that maintains a kill-list Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 08/26] VFS: Export lives_below_in_same_fs() Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 09/26] linux/stat.h: Add the filetype white-out Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 10/26] VFS white-out handling Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 11/26] tmpfs white-out support Jan Blunck
2007-08-01 15:13   ` Hugh Dickins
2007-08-02  2:48     ` Matt Mackall
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 12/26] ext2 " Jan Blunck
2007-07-31  3:45   ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2007-07-31  7:44     ` Jan Blunck
2007-07-31  8:32       ` Andreas Dilger
2007-07-31  9:08         ` Jan Blunck
2007-07-31 10:53       ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-02 19:31         ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-31 16:36   ` Josef Sipek
2007-07-31 17:00     ` Jan Blunck
2007-07-31 17:11       ` Josef Sipek
2007-08-01 15:23         ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-08-01 18:44           ` Josef Sipek
2007-08-01 19:10             ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-08-01 19:33               ` Josef Sipek
2007-08-01 19:52                 ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-08-01 22:06                   ` Erez Zadok
2007-08-02 12:05                     ` Jan Blunck
2007-08-02 11:55                 ` Jan Blunck
2007-08-02 17:50                 ` Jörn Engel
2007-08-02 18:15                   ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2007-08-02  5:24             ` Ph. Marek
2007-08-02 12:12               ` Jan Blunck
2007-08-02 10:26         ` Jan Blunck
2007-08-01 10:00       ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2007-08-01 11:43         ` Josef Sipek
2007-08-01 18:01         ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-31 17:03     ` Mark Williamson
2007-07-31 17:16       ` Josef Sipek
2007-08-01 17:58     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-01 18:03       ` Josef Sipek
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 13/26] ext3 whiteout support Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 14/26] union-mount: Documentation Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 15/26] union-mount: Add union-mount mount flag Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 16/26] union-mount: Introduce union_mount structure Jan Blunck
2007-08-06  5:57   ` Bharata B Rao
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 17/26] union-mount: Drive the union cache via dcache Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 18/26] union-mount: Changes to the namespace handling Jan Blunck
2007-08-08 10:10   ` Bharata B Rao
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 19/26] union-mount: Make lookup work for union-mounted file systems Jan Blunck
2007-08-09  5:42   ` Bharata B Rao
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 20/26] union-mount: Simple union-mount readdir implementation Jan Blunck
2007-08-06 11:08   ` Bharata B Rao
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 21/26] union-mount: in-kernel file copy between union mounted filesystems Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 22/26] union-mount: white-out changes for copy-on-open Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 23/26] union-mount: copyup on rename Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 24/26] union-mount: dont report EROFS for union mounts Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 25/26] union-mount: Debug Infrastructure Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 16:13 ` [RFC 26/26] union-mount: Debug code Jan Blunck
2007-07-30 18:23 ` [RFC 00/26] VFS based Union Mount (V2) Al Boldi
2007-08-02  6:49 ` Bharata B Rao
2007-08-02 10:17   ` Jan Blunck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070731034515.GD25876@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jblunck@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox