From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756501AbXGaJOr (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 05:14:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752630AbXGaJOh (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 05:14:37 -0400 Received: from smtp-out002.kontent.com ([81.88.40.216]:49736 "EHLO smtp-out.kontent.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752585AbXGaJOg (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 05:14:36 -0400 From: Oliver Neukum To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH 2/2] Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND (updated) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:16:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , david@lang.hm, Nigel Cunningham , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Bunk , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Richter , Pavel Machek , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds References: <200707251238.50218.lenb@kernel.org> <200707310059.50329.lenb@kernel.org> <200707311115.29057.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200707311115.29057.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200707311116.39857.oliver@neukum.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag 31 Juli 2007 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > Well, the people on linux-pm seem to agree that the .suspend() and .resume() > callbacks are not suitable for runtime power management, so having them > built without SUSPEND or HIBERNATION wouldn't be very useful. ;-) These are what USB runtime power management uses. How many code paths for power management do you want to introduce? Regards Oliver