From: "Adrian Schröter" <adrian@suse.de>
To: trenn@suse.de
Cc: Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
pavel@ucw.cz, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, lenb@kernel.org, "Zhang,
Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.22 regression: thermal trip points
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:45:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708021145.09377.adrian@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1186047747.18821.450.camel@queen.suse.de>
On Thursday 02 August 2007 11:42:27 wrote Thomas Renninger:
> On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 10:40 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote:
> > Hi everybody!
> >
> > Kernel 2.6.22 decreases performance by about 50% on my system.
> > No, I do not like that. The reason is a broken BIOS, granted, but there
> > was a perfect workaround in the kernel that has been dropped.
> >
> > mainboard: AOpen i915GMm-hfs, AWARD BIOS
> > cpu: Pentium-M 750 (0.8 to 1.86 MHz)
> > openSuSE 10.2 with kernel 2.6.22.1
>
> Is this a DELL laptop that gets throttled by 75% to throttling state 6
> if 60 degrees are exceeded?
> Adrian has such a machine..., no idea what is going on with that one,
> but only workaround to get any use out of this machine is to override at
> least the passive trip point.
JFYI, there are plenty of these systems around, it was one out of four
standard Novell modells. I am mabye just the first one who uses Factory on
it, but expect more bugreports when 10.3 gets released ...
bye
adrian
--
Adrian Schroeter
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
email: adrian@suse.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-02 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-02 8:40 2.6.22 regression: thermal trip points Knut Petersen
2007-08-02 8:52 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-02 10:48 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-02 11:00 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-02 12:05 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-02 13:04 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-02 13:16 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-02 15:57 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-02 18:38 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-02 18:40 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-03 11:16 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-03 18:59 ` Len Brown
2007-08-06 9:55 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-07 18:58 ` Len Brown
2007-08-07 21:49 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-13 12:30 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-02 15:55 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-02 9:42 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-02 9:45 ` Adrian Schröter [this message]
2007-08-02 9:58 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-02 11:02 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-02 11:13 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-02 11:45 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-02 11:56 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-02 12:42 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-02 12:55 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-02 11:59 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-02 11:57 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-02 12:06 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-02 12:15 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-02 12:35 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-02 12:47 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-02 21:56 ` Len Brown
2007-08-02 11:32 ` Knut Petersen
2007-08-02 12:06 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-02 13:06 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-02 16:07 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-02 19:25 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-08-02 21:56 ` Len Brown
2007-08-03 11:43 ` Renato S. Yamane
2007-08-03 18:35 ` Len Brown
2007-08-03 12:53 ` Knut Petersen
2007-08-03 18:30 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708021145.09377.adrian@suse.de \
--to=adrian@suse.de \
--cc=Knut_Petersen@t-online.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=aystarik@gmail.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox