From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>,
trenn@suse.de, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
Jan Dittmer <jdi@l4x.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scripts/mod/file2alias.c cross compile problem
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 20:09:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070802180903.GD2431@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A02156CC1@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:40:14AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >>> struct acpi_device_id {
> >>> __u8 id[ACPI_ID_LEN];
> >>> + __u8 dummy[FILLUP_LEN];
> >>> kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
> >>> };
> >>
> >> What's so special about this structure that we get an error?
> >
> > It's special because it's a device_id structure, and those structures
> > must come out identical using either the host or the target compiler.
>
> That didn't help me understand. Are device_id structures visible
> in some user-level API? If so, then I can see why they'd need to
> be the same (but then I'd be confused why this structure uses a
> "kernel_ulong_t" type).
I second this. For anything visible in userspace from
include/* we require usage of the kernel specific
__u8, __u16, __u32, __u64 typedefs but for device_id we accept
kernel_ulong_t which result in the following crap in
file2alias.c:
/* We use the ELF typedefs for kernel_ulong_t but bite the bullet and
* use either stdint.h or inttypes.h for the rest. */
#if KERNEL_ELFCLASS == ELFCLASS32
typedef Elf32_Addr kernel_ulong_t;
#define BITS_PER_LONG 32
#else
typedef Elf64_Addr kernel_ulong_t;
#define BITS_PER_LONG 64
#endif
And we ought to have __u64 available.
See for example types.h from asm-i386:
#if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__)
typedef __signed__ long long __s64;
typedef unsigned long long __u64;
#endif
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-02 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070727230741.GD15129@stusta.de>
[not found] ` <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A0209BB9D@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
2007-07-28 1:39 ` scripts/mod/file2alias.c cross compile problem Adrian Bunk
2007-08-02 15:09 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-02 16:25 ` Luck, Tony
2007-08-02 16:36 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-08-02 17:40 ` Luck, Tony
2007-08-02 18:09 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2007-08-02 19:15 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-02 19:24 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-08-02 19:39 ` Al Viro
2007-08-02 22:08 ` Rusty Russell
2007-08-02 23:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-16 14:27 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-08-16 16:26 ` Luck, Tony
2007-08-16 17:03 ` Thomas Renninger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070802180903.GD2431@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=jdi@l4x.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox