From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: ck@vds.kolivas.org
Cc: whansard@sbcglobal.net, Carlo Florendo <subscribermail@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Klaus Schulz <Klaus.Schulz@web.de>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: ck vs. cfs : realtime audio performance
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 18:59:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708021859.06411.Martin@lichtvoll.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708021847.49271.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Am Donnerstag 02 August 2007 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> The tone I see on responses to posts that are CCed to LKML in my
> perception often is just completely and utterly awfully unfriendly. And
> often those responses actual include factual inaccuracies and
> preliminary assumptions as well. Is that how Linux Kernel Management
> Style is supposed to work? I hope not. [...]
Well, if Carlo is not a Linux Kernel manager this comment of mine is
inapprobiate. Sorry for that.
Actually when I remind myself of all the responses I got from Ingo I did
not see anything like that what I have complained about here. I take that
as something where I can learn something: Not nearly every Linux Kernel
manager is a mean and unfriendly bastard who accuses everyone who wants
something merged or has a problem report. ;) (At least Ingo did not
accuse me for my problem reports. If I ever happen to dig that deeply
into the kernel or its documentation that I have something to merge
regarding the scheduler, I can try how he reacts to that...)
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-02 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-02 7:57 ck vs. cfs : realtime audio performance Klaus Schulz
2007-08-02 9:06 ` Carlo Florendo
[not found] ` <20070802115952.6cd4b217.whansard@sbcglobal.net>
2007-08-02 16:47 ` [ck] " Martin Steigerwald
2007-08-02 16:59 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2007-08-03 0:14 ` Carlo Florendo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708021859.06411.Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=Klaus.Schulz@web.de \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=subscribermail@gmail.com \
--cc=whansard@sbcglobal.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox