From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Rogan Dawes <lists@dawes.za.net>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: Only enable autosuspend by default on certain device classes
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 15:09:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070803140909.GA19245@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708030701.11404.david-b@pacbell.net>
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 07:01:11AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> Which is, as I pointed out, the wrong response. Desktoppy
> people should be making their tools do more intelligent things
> with new USB devices they see ... like updating databases of
> broken devices, and configuring *this* system to know that of
> the devices it regularly deals with, this handful is broken.
Popping up a box saying "Is your device broken?" isn't good UI.
> > But while this is still a likely probability, the chances are no
> > distribution is going to ship with CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND enabled.
>
> So you're saying all the distros want to make PM problems worse?
No. But given a choice between working hardware or marginally better
runtime PM, they're going to choose working hardware.
> And that with all the other desktoppy stuff they're doing, not one
> of them is willing to help make things better?
This patch is exactly that - a way of getting most of the benefits of
autosuspend without any real probability of breaking hardware. If you
mean "Are the distributions willing to pop up dialogs asking users to
start caring about obscure aspects of the USB spec", then I don't think
that's actually making things better.
> Pardon me if I want to hear distro vendors agree with you before I
> believe that.
I'm speaking as part of the Ubuntu kernel team, and I've been discussing
this with Fedora people.
>
> > Breaking
> > people's hardware (even if, at a fundamental level, it's the hardware
> > that's broken) generally irritates users - and I suspect that the users
> > it'll irritate the most are the ones who won't report it to LKML.
>
> Having a laptop drain its battery an hour before it needs to is
> also irritating. (As are the extortionate prices for each model's
> unique batteries, but that's a different issue.)
You commonly run a laptop off battery while having a printer plugged in?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-03 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-02 23:56 [PATCH] USB: Only enable autosuspend by default on certain device classes Matthew Garrett
2007-08-03 1:15 ` Greg KH
2007-08-03 1:47 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-03 2:46 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2007-08-03 6:01 ` David Brownell
2007-08-03 11:28 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-03 11:44 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-08-03 12:04 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-03 12:26 ` Rogan Dawes
2007-08-03 12:32 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-03 14:01 ` David Brownell
2007-08-03 14:09 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2007-08-03 14:28 ` Alan Stern
2007-08-03 14:33 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-03 14:41 ` Alan Stern
2007-08-03 15:10 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-03 14:43 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-08-03 14:53 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Dave Jones
2007-08-03 14:58 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-08-03 15:24 ` David Brownell
2007-08-03 15:29 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-08-03 17:47 ` Alan Stern
2007-08-03 15:25 ` Adam Kropelin
2007-08-03 15:31 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-08-03 15:48 ` Dave Jones
2007-08-03 16:49 ` David Brownell
2007-08-03 16:55 ` Adam Kropelin
2007-08-03 15:06 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-03 14:37 ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2007-08-03 15:03 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-03 16:08 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-08-03 17:49 ` Alan Stern
2007-08-03 20:03 ` Dave Jones
2007-08-03 16:29 ` David Brownell
2007-08-03 16:50 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-03 17:49 ` Greg KH
2007-08-03 17:44 ` Greg KH
2007-08-03 17:48 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-03 19:29 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-08-03 19:56 ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-08-07 9:14 ` Amit Kucheria
2007-08-03 20:12 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Dave Jones
2007-08-03 21:17 ` Alan Stern
2007-08-03 21:31 ` Dave Jones
2007-08-03 21:33 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-03 12:34 ` Felipe Balbi
2007-08-03 6:06 ` David Brownell
2007-08-03 14:22 ` Dave Jones
2007-08-03 14:52 ` David Brownell
2007-08-03 7:57 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-08-03 14:24 ` Dave Jones
2007-08-03 14:32 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-08-03 14:36 ` [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB: Only enable autosuspend by?default " Dave Jones
2007-08-03 19:34 ` [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB: Only enable autosuspend by default " Pete Zaitcev
2007-08-03 19:45 ` Dave Jones
2007-08-03 20:04 ` Pete Zaitcev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070803140909.GA19245@srcf.ucam.org \
--to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=lists@dawes.za.net \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox