From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
Stefan Walter <stefan.walter@inf.ethz.ch>,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [NFS] rpc.mountd crashes when extensively using netgroups
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:07:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070803160709.GD456@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18098.39541.547557.132952@notabene.brown>
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 01:01:09PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> The core issue is this:
>
> We need to map IPADDRESS to THING, and THING + PATH to EXPORTPOINT.
> (roughly).
> So what do we choose for "THING"?
>
> One obvious option is the dotted quad of the IP address.
> People tend to have large sets of similar clients, so doing this seems
> to be missing out on a valuable optimisation and adding bloat to the
> lookup tables in the kernel.
$ gdb vmlinux
GNU gdb 6.6-debian
...
(gdb) print sizeof(struct ip_map)
$1 = 40
(gdb) print sizeof(struct svc_export)
$2 = 136
Hm, OK, one-address-per-export loses.
> I guess we could use a hash and keep a hash table in mountd.
> So mountd:
> 1/ Generates the comma-separated name as needed, being careful to
> allocate enough space.
> 2a/ If this is small enough, write it to the kernel as is.
> 2b/ If it is too big, Find it in a table (adding if needed) and
> write the address of the table entry to the kernel
>
> When a THING + PATH request arrives:
> If THING looks like an address in the table, do the lookup to get
> the string.
>
> This would work to keep the strings in the kernel shorter, but is
> rather ugly - storing in the kernel addresses in a user-space program.
If you use an actual collision-free hash function then the result will
be reproduceable, so you don't have to depend on temporary information
in mountd.
> So maybe we want to combine the two workable approaches.
>
> Sometimes IPADDRESS maps to DOTTED_QUAD
> Sometimes IPADDRESS maps to LIST,OF,STRINGS,FROM,ETC,EXPORTS
>
> Possibly the choice could be based on a command line switch.
> In the absence of such a switch, it could be based on the number of
> entries in /etc/exports.
Seems OK.
--b.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-03 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-30 12:55 rpc.mountd crashes when extensively using netgroups Stefan Walter
2007-07-31 13:59 ` Steve Dickson
2007-08-02 9:04 ` Stefan Walter
2007-08-03 2:40 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-08-03 14:51 ` Steve Dickson
2007-07-31 14:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-02 15:32 ` [NFS] " Jeff Layton
2007-08-02 16:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-02 16:28 ` Jeff Layton
2007-08-03 3:01 ` Neil Brown
2007-08-03 7:57 ` Stefan Walter
2007-08-03 16:07 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070803160709.GD456@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stefan.walter@inf.ethz.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox