From: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Valerie Henson <val@nmt.edu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
tulip-users@lists.sourceforge.net,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>,
david@lang.hm, Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: [PATCH][RESEND] Semi-pointless NULL test in uli526x driver
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 20:32:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708042032.12317.jesper.juhl@gmail.com> (raw)
(resending previously submitted patch from 16/7-2007 22:40)
Hi,
In drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c::uli526x_interrupt() there's a test
of the function argument 'void *dev_id' against NULL. But that
test is pretty pointless, since if ever 'dev_id' is NULL we'll
already have crashed inside "netdev_priv(dev)".
I don't think dev_id can ever actually be NULL, so the whole block
inside "if (!dev) {" could probably just go away. But I guess
there's a good reason someone put that ULI526X_DBUG() in there - and
if 'dev_id' /can/ actually be NULL then it's nice to have and in
that case this patch actually fixes a possible crash (hence the
version number update).
So I guess that in this case we should just move the
"db = netdev_priv(dev)" assignment past that NULL test. That's what
this patch does.
Found by the Coverity checker.
Compile tested.
PS. Please keep me on Cc when replying.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c | 7 ++++---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c b/drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c
index ca2548e..3df2376 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@
*/
#define DRV_NAME "uli526x"
-#define DRV_VERSION "0.9.3"
-#define DRV_RELDATE "2005-7-29"
+#define DRV_VERSION "0.9.4"
+#define DRV_RELDATE "2007-7-16"
#include <linux/module.h>
@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int uli526x_stop(struct net_device *dev)
static irqreturn_t uli526x_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct net_device *dev = dev_id;
- struct uli526x_board_info *db = netdev_priv(dev);
+ struct uli526x_board_info *db;
unsigned long ioaddr = dev->base_addr;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -670,6 +670,7 @@ static irqreturn_t uli526x_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
ULI526X_DBUG(1, "uli526x_interrupt() without DEVICE arg", 0);
return IRQ_NONE;
}
+ db = netdev_priv(dev);
spin_lock_irqsave(&db->lock, flags);
outl(0, ioaddr + DCR7);
next reply other threads:[~2007-08-04 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-04 18:32 Jesper Juhl [this message]
2007-08-04 21:14 ` [PATCH][RESEND] Semi-pointless NULL test in uli526x driver Kyle McMartin
2007-08-07 21:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-07 21:28 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-08-07 21:32 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708042032.12317.jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--to=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@lang.hm \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tulip-users@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=val@nmt.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox