From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755730AbXHEG5V (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Aug 2007 02:57:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752495AbXHEG5M (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Aug 2007 02:57:12 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:56244 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752375AbXHEG5L (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Aug 2007 02:57:11 -0400 Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:56:46 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , RT , "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [BUG RT] WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:5071 2.6.23-rc1-rt7 Message-ID: <20070805065646.GA515@elte.hu> References: <1186290816.636.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1186290816.636.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7-deb -1.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Steven Rostedt wrote: > Ingo, > > The below ifndef, shouldn't that be ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_SOFTIRQS ? I > hit that warning while I was running !PREEMPT_RT but with both hard > and softiqs as threads. yeah, indeed - fixed. > P.S. I really found out that the system becomes VERY non-responsive > when you run with both hard and softirqs as threads, but with > PREEMPT_NONE ;-) hm. That's not supposed to happen. Could there be some wakeup or softirq processing problem? Ingo