From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Axel Reinhold <axel@freakout.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Bug in 2.4.35 when compiled gcc>=4.2.0 and -march=c3
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 17:43:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070805154337.GA4716@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708050856.l758u4ou031651@bongo.freakout.de>
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 10:56:04AM +0200, Axel Reinhold wrote:
> i found a bug in linux-2.4.35.
>
> the bug produces a crashing kernel when compiled
> with gcc >=4.2.0 and VIA C3 optimized -march=c3
> (CONFIG_MCYRIXIII=y)
>
> this issue was first discussed on the gcc bugzilla:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32264
>
> and tracked down to the include/asm-i386/hw_irq.h
> module with the help of the gcc guys:
>
> (pluto at agmk dot net) wrote:
> >yup, i see something new :)
> >
> >please look at line 12137 of i8259.i:
> >
> >__attribute__((regparm(0))) void call_do_IRQ(void); __asm__(...
> >
> >as you can see there is a semicolon after call_do_IRQ(void)
> >and following asm statement isn't treated as a function body.
> >in this way -O1 -f{no-}unit-at-a-time accidentally produces
> >different code. it's not a gcc bug.
> >
> >linux-2.4.35/include/asm-i386/hw_irq.h
> >contains these evil macros.
>
> is there a chance to fix this?
> these macros a far beyond my capabilities to fix.
Axel,
I've reproduced it and posted the following explanation to GCC's
bugzilla ; I think I can provide you with a simple fix very soon.
Cheers,
Willy
----
Reproduced with trivial code. The reason is very simple : The asm code
is emitted in the .data section, because due to the -fno-unit-at-a-time
argument, the "interrupts" array is declared first and sets the current
section to .data.
Interestingly, adding __attribute__ ((section(".text"))) before the
function declaration does not change anything. But adding ".section .text\n"
in the asm statement fixes it.
In fact, -fno-unit-at-a-time does not work on this code under gcc-4.2.1,
while it works with gcc-4.1.1. However, using the recommended
-fno-toplevel-reorder argument fixes the problem. Also, if the "dummy"
array below is declared before the asm statement, then even gcc-4.1.1
emits the code in the .data section.
In all cases, removing -fno-unit-at-a-time produces good code. I still
suspect that because the behaviour is different between 4.1 and 4.2, it
might be a regression in 4.2, but since its replacement works, I'm not
sure it's worth investigating further. I'll work on a fix for linux-2.4.
Trivial example below :
/* the following code may go to .data if compiled with gcc >= 4.1 and
* -fno-unit-at-a-time
*/
void common_interrupt(void);
__asm__( "\n"
".align 4,0x90""\n"
"common_interrupt:\n\t"
"cld\n\t"
);
/* If dummy is not initialized, the code above goes into .text.
* If dummy is initialized to zero, the code above goes into .bss
* If dummy is initialized to non-zero, the code goes into .data
* If dummy is declared before the code above, then it goes to .data
* whatever the compiler.
*/
int dummy[1] = { 1 };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-05 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-05 8:56 Kernel Bug in 2.4.35 when compiled gcc>=4.2.0 and -march=c3 Axel Reinhold
2007-08-05 9:49 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-08-05 15:43 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2007-08-05 19:17 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-08-06 13:05 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-06 13:26 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-08-06 17:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-06 17:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-08-06 18:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-06 19:13 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-08-06 21:15 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-06 21:16 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-08-07 5:04 ` Axel Reinhold
2007-08-07 8:12 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070805154337.GA4716@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=axel@freakout.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox