public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Cc: dev@openvz.org, gregkh@suse.de, devel@openvz.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci_get_device call from interrupt in reboot fixups
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:03:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070806130326.87415ad0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070803103924.GA23786@iris.sw.ru>

On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:39:24 +0400 "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org> wrote:

> The following calltrace is possible now:
>  handle_sysrq
>    machine_emergency_restart
>      mach_reboot_fixups
>        pci_get_device
>          pci_get_subsys
> 	   down_read
> The patch obtains PCI device during initialization to avoid bothering PCI
> search engine in interrupt. Devices used in this code are not supposed to
> be pluggable, so it looks safe to keep them.
> 

hm.

> 
> diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/reboot_fixups.c b/arch/i386/kernel/reboot_fixups.c
> index 03e1cce..873ad55 100644
> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/reboot_fixups.c
> +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/reboot_fixups.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct device_fixup {
>  	unsigned int vendor;
>  	unsigned int device;
>  	void (*reboot_fixup)(struct pci_dev *);
> +	struct pci_dev *dev;
>  };
>  
>  static struct device_fixup fixups_table[] = {
> @@ -49,20 +50,35 @@ static struct device_fixup fixups_table[] = {
>   * is a fixup, we call it and we expect to never return from it. if we
>   * do return, we keep looking and then eventually fall back to the
>   * standard mach_reboot on return.
> + *
> + * Unfortunately, this code can be called from an interrupt and it is
> + * impossible to get PCI device directly. So, lets prepare the list
> + * beforehand.

This comment should tell the reader which interrupt path that is (ie: sysrq-B).

>   */
>  void mach_reboot_fixups(void)
>  {
>  	struct device_fixup *cur;
> -	struct pci_dev *dev;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	for (i=0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fixups_table); i++) {
>  		cur = &(fixups_table[i]);
> -		dev = pci_get_device(cur->vendor, cur->device, NULL);
> -		if (!dev)
> +		if (cur->dev == NULL)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		cur->reboot_fixup(dev);
> +		cur->reboot_fixup(cur->dev);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +int mach_fixup_init(void)
> +{
> +	struct device_fixup *cur;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i=0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fixups_table); i++) {
> +		cur = &(fixups_table[i]);
> +		cur->dev = pci_get_device(cur->vendor, cur->device, NULL);
>  	}
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +module_init(mach_fixup_init);

I'm not sure that we want to make core PCI code capable of being called
from interrupt context just for the sake of sysrq-B.  It adds complexity
and maintenance hassles for something which is largely a debugging feature.

otoh, the patch is faily simple-looking and people _do_ use sysrq-B fairly
often so I guess we'll find out if we break it again.

otoh2, perhaps we can find some quicky hack on the sysrq patch to shut up
the might_sleep() warnings (which I presume is the only problem which is
presently being exhibited?).  Something like the unpleasant
oops_in_progress, perhaps.

Greg, any preferences?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-06 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-03 10:39 [PATCH] pci_get_device call from interrupt in reboot fixups Denis V. Lunev
2007-08-04  4:08 ` Greg KH
2007-08-06  7:16   ` Denis V. Lunev
2007-08-07  2:49     ` Greg KH
2007-08-07  7:24       ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-07  7:44         ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-07  7:42           ` Greg KH
2007-08-07  7:50             ` Denis V. Lunev
2007-08-07  7:48         ` Denis V. Lunev
2007-08-06 20:03 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-07  9:04 Denis V. Lunev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070806130326.87415ad0.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=dev@openvz.org \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox