public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, "Denis V. Lunev" <den@sw.ru>,
	"Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>,
	dev@openvz.org, devel@openvz.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci_get_device call from interrupt in reboot fixups
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 00:44:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070807004455.b634c5d0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070807002437.0e7b9ee5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 00:24:37 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> > Andrew, I really don't want to change the PCI core to handle this, as we
> > finally fixed a lot of issues with drivers trying to walk these lists
> > from interrupt context.  So if you want to just hide the warning message
> > as we are shutting down, that's fine with me.  Or just don't do the
> > fixups.  But grabbing a reference to the pci device is unsafe in my
> > opinion and I do not want to do that.
> > 
> 
> OK, good decision ;)
> 
> One approach would be for some brave soul to pick his way through
> the reboot code and ensure that we are correctly and reliably setting
> system_state to SYSTEM_RESTART, then test that in __might_sleep().
> 
> But this does suppress somewhat-useful debugging just because of sysrq-B
> and I really wouldn't want to utilise the horrid system_state any more that
> we are presently doing.  I think on balance that it would be better if we
> could do something more targetted, like modify emergency_restart() to test
> in_interrupt() and to then apologetically set some well-named global flag
> which will shut up __might_sleep().  Pretty foul, but I can't think of
> anything better.

ok, this might be better.  How about we just stop calling mach_reboot_fixups()
at sysrq-B time?

> > >>  handle_sysrq
> > >>    machine_emergency_restart
> > >>      mach_reboot_fixups
> > >>        pci_get_device
> > >>          pci_get_subsys
> > >> 	   down_read

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-07  7:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-03 10:39 [PATCH] pci_get_device call from interrupt in reboot fixups Denis V. Lunev
2007-08-04  4:08 ` Greg KH
2007-08-06  7:16   ` Denis V. Lunev
2007-08-07  2:49     ` Greg KH
2007-08-07  7:24       ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-07  7:44         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-08-07  7:42           ` Greg KH
2007-08-07  7:50             ` Denis V. Lunev
2007-08-07  7:48         ` Denis V. Lunev
2007-08-06 20:03 ` Andrew Morton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-07  9:04 Denis V. Lunev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070807004455.b634c5d0.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=den@sw.ru \
    --cc=dev@openvz.org \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox