From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, "Denis V. Lunev" <den@sw.ru>,
"Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>,
dev@openvz.org, devel@openvz.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci_get_device call from interrupt in reboot fixups
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 00:44:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070807004455.b634c5d0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070807002437.0e7b9ee5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 00:24:37 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > Andrew, I really don't want to change the PCI core to handle this, as we
> > finally fixed a lot of issues with drivers trying to walk these lists
> > from interrupt context. So if you want to just hide the warning message
> > as we are shutting down, that's fine with me. Or just don't do the
> > fixups. But grabbing a reference to the pci device is unsafe in my
> > opinion and I do not want to do that.
> >
>
> OK, good decision ;)
>
> One approach would be for some brave soul to pick his way through
> the reboot code and ensure that we are correctly and reliably setting
> system_state to SYSTEM_RESTART, then test that in __might_sleep().
>
> But this does suppress somewhat-useful debugging just because of sysrq-B
> and I really wouldn't want to utilise the horrid system_state any more that
> we are presently doing. I think on balance that it would be better if we
> could do something more targetted, like modify emergency_restart() to test
> in_interrupt() and to then apologetically set some well-named global flag
> which will shut up __might_sleep(). Pretty foul, but I can't think of
> anything better.
ok, this might be better. How about we just stop calling mach_reboot_fixups()
at sysrq-B time?
> > >> handle_sysrq
> > >> machine_emergency_restart
> > >> mach_reboot_fixups
> > >> pci_get_device
> > >> pci_get_subsys
> > >> down_read
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-07 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-03 10:39 [PATCH] pci_get_device call from interrupt in reboot fixups Denis V. Lunev
2007-08-04 4:08 ` Greg KH
2007-08-06 7:16 ` Denis V. Lunev
2007-08-07 2:49 ` Greg KH
2007-08-07 7:24 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-07 7:44 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-08-07 7:42 ` Greg KH
2007-08-07 7:50 ` Denis V. Lunev
2007-08-07 7:48 ` Denis V. Lunev
2007-08-06 20:03 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-07 9:04 Denis V. Lunev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070807004455.b634c5d0.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=den@sw.ru \
--cc=dev@openvz.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox