From: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Paul E McKenney <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Cpu-Hotplug and Real-Time
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:33:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070807173336.GA4472@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070807151336.GA507@tv-sign.ru>
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 07:13:36PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/07, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> >
> > After some debugging, I saw that the hang occured because
> > the high prio process was stuck in a loop doing yield() inside
> > wait_task_inactive(). Description follows:
> >
> > Say a high-prio task (A) does a kthread_create(B),
> > followed by a kthread_bind(B, cpu1). At this moment,
> > only cpu0 is online.
> >
> > Now, immediately after being created, B would
> > do a
> > complete(&create->started) [kernel/kthread.c: kthread()],
> > before scheduling itself out.
> >
> > This complete() will wake up kthreadd, which had spawned B.
> > It is possible that during the wakeup, kthreadd might preempt B.
> > Thus, B is still on the runqueue, and not yet called schedule().
> >
> > kthreadd, will inturn do a
> > complete(&create->done); [kernel/kthread.c: create_kthread()]
> > which will wake up the thread which had called kthread_create().
> > In our case it's task A, which will run immediately, since its priority
> > is higher.
> >
> > A will now call kthread_bind(B, cpu1).
> > kthread_bind(), calls wait_task_inactive(B), to ensures that
> > B has scheduled itself out.
> >
> > B is still on the runqueue, so A calls yield() in wait_task_inactive().
> > But since A is the task with the highest prio, scheduler schedules it
> > back again.
> >
> > Thus B never gets to run to schedule itself out.
> > A loops waiting for B to schedule out leading to system hang.
>
> As for kthread_bind(), I think wait_task_inactive+set_task_cpu is just
> an optimization, and easy to "fix":
>
> --- kernel/kthread.c 2007-07-28 16:58:17.000000000 +0400
> +++ /proc/self/fd/0 2007-08-07 18:56:54.248073547 +0400
> @@ -166,10 +166,7 @@ void kthread_bind(struct task_struct *k,
> WARN_ON(1);
> return;
> }
> - /* Must have done schedule() in kthread() before we set_task_cpu */
> - wait_task_inactive(k);
> - set_task_cpu(k, cpu);
> - k->cpus_allowed = cpumask_of_cpu(cpu);
> + set_cpus_allowed(current, cpumask_of_cpu(cpu));
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kthread_bind);
>
Not sure whether set_cpus_allowed() will work here. Looks like, it needs the
CPU to be online during the call and in kthread_bind() case CPU may be offline.
Thanks,
Venki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-07 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-07 13:12 Cpu-Hotplug and Real-Time Gautham R Shenoy
2007-08-07 15:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-08-07 17:33 ` Venki Pallipadi [this message]
2007-08-07 18:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-08-09 17:03 ` rt ptracer can monopolize CPU (was: Cpu-Hotplug and Real-Time) Oleg Nesterov
2007-08-16 12:06 ` Gautham R Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070807173336.GA4472@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox