From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: "Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>,
ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Pavel Machek" <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] suspend/hibernation regression between 2.6.19 and 2.6.20 w/ Thinkpad T41
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 22:24:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708082224.39337.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070808144854.GB9587@khazad-dum.debian.net>
On Wednesday, 8 August 2007 16:48, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Aug 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > I wish we loaded the kernel just once, maybe from the boot loader.
> >
> > Well, that's not so easy. That will work for the bare image, but if we want it
> > to be compressed and/or encrypted, then the boot loader will need to
> > contain all of the necessary code.
>
> Doing things right always have an associated cost, or we'd be doing it right
> since day one...
>
> > I may be doable by using a special boot kernel with ACPI disabled and only
> > as many drivers as required to load the image, but that will make it more
> > difficult to set up and to recover from errors.
>
> Better than the walking bomb we have now. When waking from suspend-to-disk,
> we should not overwrite ANY non-kernel data which has ties to external
> systems (the hardware, the firmware). Instead, we should re-init everything
> (re-init hardware to make sure we know in which state it is, re-init
> ourselves, to make sure we match the firmware and hardware state), as if we
> were booting a cold system in the first place.
Yes, we've already had an agreement about that on linux-pm, now the problem is
to implement it and not to break things in the process ...
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-08 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-05 17:02 suspend/hibernation regression between 2.6.19 and 2.6.20 w/ Thinkpad T41 Toralf Förster
2007-08-05 20:11 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-08-05 22:29 ` Pavel Machek
2007-08-06 9:36 ` Toralf Förster
2007-08-06 14:36 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-08-06 14:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-06 15:03 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-08-06 19:13 ` Toralf Förster
2007-08-07 0:21 ` [ibm-acpi-devel] " Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-08-07 13:21 ` Toralf Förster
2007-08-07 15:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-08 9:22 ` Toralf Förster
2007-08-08 12:04 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-08-08 12:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-08 14:48 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2007-08-08 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708082224.39337.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox