From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Miles Lane" <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"shannon.nelson@intel.com" <shannon.nelson@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc2-mm1 -- drivers/dma/ioat_dca.c:177: error: implicit declaration of function ___cpu_physical_id___
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:52:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070809115258.5372f76e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a44ae5cd0708090718v5dc19572k69087f170f9ba857@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 10:18:15 -0400
"Miles Lane" <miles.lane@gmail.com> wrote:
> CC drivers/dma/ioat_dca.o
> drivers/dma/ioat_dca.c: In function 'ioat_dca_get_tag':
> drivers/dma/ioat_dca.c:177: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'cpu_physical_id'
Looks like cpu_physical_id() doesn't get implemented if CONFIG_SMP=n.
Either ioat needs to stop using cpu_physical_id() if SMP=n, or the
supported architectures (i386, x86_64, ia64) should provide a non-SMP
version of cpu_physical_id(). Preferably the latter, I'd say.
Something like this, I suppose...
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
i386, x86_64 and ia64 implement cpu_physical_id() if CONFIG_SMP=y.
Provide a uniprocessor stub so that callers will dtrt.
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/smp.h | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff -puN include/linux/smp.h~implement-cpu_physical_id-on-smp=n include/linux/smp.h
--- a/include/linux/smp.h~implement-cpu_physical_id-on-smp=n
+++ a/include/linux/smp.h
@@ -108,6 +108,11 @@ static inline void smp_send_reschedule(i
0; \
})
+static inline unsigned cpu_physical_id(unsigned cpu)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
#endif /* !SMP */
/*
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-09 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-09 14:18 2.6.23-rc2-mm1 -- drivers/dma/ioat_dca.c:177: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_physical_id’ Miles Lane
2007-08-09 14:32 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-09 18:24 ` Miles Lane
2007-08-09 18:52 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-08-10 13:13 ` 2.6.23-rc2-mm1 -- drivers/dma/ioat_dca.c:177: error: implicit declaration of function ___cpu_physical_id___ Miles Lane
2007-08-10 13:27 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-10 16:46 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070809115258.5372f76e.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
--cc=shannon.nelson@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox