From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765262AbXHIXrR (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2007 19:47:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755483AbXHIXrA (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2007 19:47:00 -0400 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.189]:45900 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755669AbXHIXq7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2007 19:46:59 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-disposition:message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Lwy45BF/GyqML8wJwCfRiZ1WClhciUal2xfz8Onj2bBO5jv/UNz4OjOlYwv0veEXOq8+97krIvkSGfARyiCwlpxLVci8ak7xy5yzudAcslTMinFFqrFTgrkWkxsO9IQw+T/0vsixKYilSQAQdGK1gJTNZ0oLkfUNKM5PZRBT7eI= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] pata_artop: fix UDMA5 for AEC6280[R] and UDMA6 for AEC6880[R] Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:45:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200708092319.34828.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20070809235455.3117d5dc@the-village.bc.nu> In-Reply-To: <20070809235455.3117d5dc@the-village.bc.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708100145.38739.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 10 August 2007, Alan Cox wrote: > On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 23:19:34 +0200 > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > > Maximum supported UDMA mode for AEC6280[R] is UDMA5 (not UDMA4) > > and for AEC6880[R] it is UDMA6 (not UDMA5): > > > > * Fix the problem by adding missing struct ata_port_info to artop_init_one(). > > > > * Use the right naming (s/626/628/). > > > > * Bump driver version. > > > > Fixes IDE->libata regression, problem was never present in IDE aec62xx driver. > > Have you tested this ?? -ENODEV so no and testing is welcomed. However I went over both drivers to make sure that this change is safe and correct. BTW presence of the above bugs would strongly indicate that pata_artop has never been tested (properly) with AEC6x80[R], otherwise these bugs should have been noticed and fixed much earlier. Thanks, Bart