public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Are we properly prepared to handle 3 Socket setups?
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:24:55 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070812072455.GB22250@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490708111852y569a3e18i1c3d192e60eceafe@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 03:52:48AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 12/08/07, Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 08/12/2007 03:08 AM, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >
> > > This may be a little off topic, but I think it's interresting enough
> > > to warrent a single mail.
> > >
> > > I just saw a news article (http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=41610)
> > > about a 3 Socket Opteron motherboard and couldn't help but wonder if
> > > we are prepared to deal with such a beast, so I thought I'd inform
> > > everyone :-)
> > >
> > > I'm guessing equipping such a board with 3 single core CPU's could
> > > show up some interresting corner cases in schedular code and
> > > elsewhere, I'll bet we have some assumptions somewhere about
> > > nr_of_cpus being an even number...
> >
> > I would hope the N=1 case will have flushed out enough of those... :-|
> >
> Hehe, true, but I was thinking more of nr_of_cpus is an odd number > 1. :-)
> Just thinking of having to divide things by 3 makes me worry ;-)  ...
> 
These sorts of cases happen frequently enough today as it is in an
operational capacity, CPU hotplug will have the sytem in such states
already on systems with an even number. This is generally why things like
the online map and corresponding cpumasks are what counts, while the
total number of possible CPUs can be a drastically different number.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-12  7:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-12  1:08 Are we properly prepared to handle 3 Socket setups? Jesper Juhl
2007-08-12  1:27 ` Rene Herman
2007-08-12  1:52   ` Jesper Juhl
2007-08-12  3:17     ` Rene Herman
2007-08-12  3:29       ` Roland Dreier
2007-08-12  3:36         ` Rene Herman
2007-08-12  8:35       ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-12 20:00         ` Rene Herman
2007-08-13 20:44           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-12  7:24     ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2007-08-12  8:41   ` Willy Tarreau
2007-08-12 11:46 ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070812072455.GB22250@linux-sh.org \
    --to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rene.herman@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox