From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
sam@ravnborg.org
Subject: binutils trouble was Re: [1/2] 2.6.23-rc3: known regressions with patches
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:42:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070813224205.GA8760@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070813212947.GK18945@stusta.de>
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:29:47PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Debian 4.0 has older ones, and all distributions released more than a
> year ago for sure also have older ones (the required patch went into
> binutils CVS on 2006-05-30 and 2.17.50.0.3 was released on 2006-07-15).
I have no problem on SUSE 10.0 (2.16.91.0.2-8) or SLES9 (2.15.90.0.1.1-32.10)
which are both far older than a year. Both produce good looking
vdso.sos.
sles8 (2.12.90.0.15; it was really one of the first production
binutils for x86-64) doesn't work out of the box (looks like as-instr doesn't
work anymore and it has another assembler issue I'll fix)
but with that workarounded it also builds a reasonble looking vdso
Sam, can you please take a look at the as-instr issue? It seems
to succeed now when it should fail.
It would be useful if someone could find out which binutils versions
really not work.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-13 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-13 17:59 [1/2] 2.6.23-rc3: known regressions with patches Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-13 18:04 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-13 18:13 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-13 18:10 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-18 10:56 ` [PATCH] Add some help texts to recently-introduced kconfig items Stefan Richter
2007-08-13 18:42 ` [1/2] 2.6.23-rc3: known regressions with patches Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 20:24 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-13 20:56 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-13 21:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-13 22:42 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-08-13 22:54 ` binutils trouble was " Adrian Bunk
2007-08-13 23:51 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-27 8:35 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070813224205.GA8760@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox