public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove Documentation/networking/net-modules.txt
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:22:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070814222245.GF18945@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46C226D1.4070203@pobox.com>

On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 06:04:01PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> According to git, the only one who touched this file during the last
>> 5 years was me when removing drivers...
>> modinfo offers less ancient information.
>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> This patch has been sent on:
>> - 23 Jul 2007
>>  Documentation/networking/00-INDEX        |    2  
>> Documentation/networking/net-modules.txt |  315 -----------------------
>>  2 files changed, 317 deletions(-)
>
> NAK, IMO it's still use for ancient drivers

Is there any that lacks a MODULE_PARM_DESC()?
If yes, shouln't we fix such drivers instead?

Even for ancient drivers net-modules.txt is outdated and sometimes lists 
no longer existing or doesn't document more recent parameters.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-14 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-14 21:26 [2.6 patch] remove Documentation/networking/net-modules.txt Adrian Bunk
2007-08-14 22:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-14 22:22   ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-08-15  7:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-08-16  3:22 ` Paul Gortmaker
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-24 16:25 Adrian Bunk
2007-10-25  7:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-29 15:18 ` Pekka Pietikainen
2007-11-05 17:04   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-23 18:31 Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070814222245.GF18945@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox