From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934335AbXHOTMT (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:12:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756192AbXHOTMD (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:12:03 -0400 Received: from smtp115.sbc.mail.re3.yahoo.com ([66.196.96.88]:38586 "HELO smtp115.sbc.mail.re3.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756167AbXHOTMB (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:12:01 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=4mWFZQLOnGv0pHkw/1NLAz+prmPArcBq5zlAidFh2SN8+rwKid/WzFDubcI0MIRpCMXZlDZkksLUGphg2Oayvhp5t928FsdBaKTS9sQVcnyJQ0+is5eRf4V56kGo54BYQEt8NV1FwHojvTxsqkelA7hgHbOvK3y2/ICBE7PotKE= ; X-YMail-OSG: .BGhiEgVM1nKOZp9ipuKPFBQvlWqRY6qXQUrXBKMTk322j2h5UV30u4CDhKcm96EIzCVy8XPwg-- From: David Brownell To: Stuart_Hayes@dell.com Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] EHCI Regression in 2.6.23-rc2 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:12:03 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, webmaster@dragonslave.de, greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200708101045.57166.dex@dragonslave.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708151212.04065.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 15 August 2007, Stuart_Hayes@dell.com wrote: > So... I still think blacklisting the VIA controllers from this CPU > frequency stuff is the best option.   Sadly, yes. My negative impression of VIA quality is confirmed, yet again... Please make sure the comments in your blacklist code describe both of the chip bugs you've observed. > It is unlikely that any real issues > will be seen during CPU frequency transitions with these controllers > anyway, because they claim to cache 8 uframes of the periodic schedule. I'd not be so sure. But if there are such issues, we can wait for problem reports. - Dvae