public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 002 of 5] Replace bio_data with blk_rq_data
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:19:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070816111903.GU23758@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18116.12755.587269.111597@notabene.brown>

On Thu, Aug 16 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Thursday August 16, jens.axboe@oracle.com wrote:
> > > 2 and 3 are very simple changes that - I think - make it clearer what
> > > is happening.
> > 
> > To be honest, I don't see much win in using blk_rq_data() over
> > bio_data() at all. I'd much much rather just see it go away!
> > 
> 
> Well, as it is always the data at the (current) head of the request...
> 
> But I can make it go a way if you like.. What does it become?
> bvec_kmap ??

Yeah, it then just becomes a kmap. And ->buffer goes away completely.

> > > And I felt 5 was a sufficient improvement to justify it and 4...
> > 
> > 5 is nice, I would like to apply that :-)
> > 
> 
> OK, here comes '5' at the top of a small set of patches.  Take it and
> any of the following that you like.

Thanks.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-16 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-16  5:13 [PATCH 000 of 5] Introductory patches for bio refactor NeilBrown
2007-08-16  5:13 ` [PATCH 001 of 5] Don't update bi_hw_*_size if we aren't going to merge NeilBrown
2007-08-16  7:01   ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-16  5:13 ` [PATCH 002 of 5] Replace bio_data with blk_rq_data NeilBrown
2007-08-16  7:02   ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-16  7:15     ` Neil Brown
2007-08-16  7:21       ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-16 11:15         ` Neil Brown
2007-08-16 11:19           ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2007-08-16 11:22           ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-16  5:13 ` [PATCH 003 of 5] Replace bio_cur_sectors with blk_rq_cur_sectors NeilBrown
2007-08-16  5:13 ` [PATCH 004 of 5] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio NeilBrown
2007-08-16  5:13 ` [PATCH 005 of 5] Merge blk_recount_segments into blk_recalc_rq_segments NeilBrown
2007-08-16  6:37 ` [PATCH 000 of 5] Introductory patches for bio refactor Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070816111903.GU23758@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox